• Skip to main content
  • Skip to secondary menu
  • Skip to primary sidebar
  • Skip to footer
  • MANUFACTURERS
  • HEADHUNTERS
  • COMPANIES

SPINEMarketGroup

Spine Industry News

  • HOME
  • 2026
  • 2025
  • 2024
  • BROCHURES
  • ARTICLES
  • PRODUCT LIBRARY

Life Spine Announces Published Article on Discectomy Performance During Transforaminal Lumbar Interbody Fusion Approach Using Endoscopic Technique vs MIS Tubular Approach

September 18, 2024 By SPINEMarketGroup

HUNTLEY, Ill.–(BUSINESS WIRE)–Life Spine, Inc., a medical device company that designs, develops, manufactures and markets products for the surgical treatment of spinal disorders, announced today that Spine, an international, peer-reviewed journal has published a new study examining Discectomy performance during TLIF approaches using an Endoscopic technique versus a MIS Tubular approach1.

The study, utilizing Life Spine products, evaluated outcomes across 29 spinal levels, consisting of 14 E-TLIF and 15 T-TLIF procedures. After discectomy, each disc was transected, and digital imaging software was employed to analyze and quantify the percentage of discectomy completed. Additionally, the duration required for each discectomy was compared between the two techniques. Pedicle screws were inserted contralaterally to the TLIF, and the change in interpedicular distance post-expandable cage implantation was assessed as an indicator of indirect decompression, with results compared across the techniques.

Results of the study showed that discectomy performance between an endoscopic TLIF was equivalent to a traditional MIS tubular TLIF approach for a discectomy. The percentage of discectomy showed no difference between tubular TLIF and an endoscopic TLIF (48.86%+/-6.98% T-TLIF vs. 50.26%+/-7.38% E-TLIF, P=0.61). There was no statistical difference between interpedicular distance created (2.20 mm+/-1.97 mm T-TLIF vs 1.36 mm+/-1.82 mm E-TLIF, P=0.24). This indicated that an adequate indirect decompression could be achieved via an endoscopic approach. An endoscopic TLIF took less time than MIS-TLIF (20.00 min+/-7.12 min vs 15.22 min+/-4.42 min, P=0.048) based on our cadaveric experiment.

“Our study demonstrates the utility of Life Spine’s endoscopic TLIF platform to perform an appropriate discectomy for spinal fusion,” said Sohrab Virk, MD. “Through an exhaustive cadaveric analysis, we found that discectomy performance was equivalent between an endoscopic TLIF approach and a traditional tubular MIS approach.”

1 Boddapati V, Yuk F, Virk S. A Cadaveric Comparison of Discectomy Performance During Transforaminal Lumbar Interbody Fusion Approach Using an Endoscopic Technique versus a Minimally Invasive Tubular Approach. Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2024 Aug 15. doi: 10.1097/BRS.0000000000005122. Epub ahead of print. PMID:39146210.

Learn more about our Micro Invasive™ Endoscopic Solutions at North American Spine Society (NASS) 2024 in Chicago at booth 3220.

About Life Spine

Life Spine, Inc., is dedicated to improving the quality of life for spinal patients by increasing procedural efficiency and efficacy through innovative design, uncompromising quality standards, and the most technologically advanced manufacturing platforms. Life Spine, which is privately held, is based in Huntley, Illinois. For more information, please visit: http://www.lifespine.com.

Contacts

Mr. Omar Faruqi 
Chief Financial Officer 
ofaruqi@lifespine.com 
847-884-6117

Related Posts:

  • Life Spine Announces Continued Success and Industry…
  • Life Spine Announces MR Conditional Status for…
  • SpineView

Filed Under: NEWS Tagged With: 2024

Primary Sidebar

PLATINUM SPONSORS

EXALTA 2LOGO-min
GLOBAL biomedica
NORMED newLOGO-min
GENESYS SPINE
SPINEGUARD2025
Dymicron 2
GSMEDICAL2025
spinewaygroup
RUTHLESS SPINE
RUDISHAUER
NGMEDICAL
LfC
ispine
CENTINEL SPINE
TSUNAMI MEDICAL
syntropiq logo
A-SPINE
L&Kmodelo log

POPULAR POST LAST 90 DAYS

  • DePuy Synthes for Sale: Who Could Actually Buy the…
  • Globus Medical: Stronger in Spine, but Could DePuy…
  • BROCHURES
  • PRODUCT LIBRARY
  • Globus Medical’s Strategy: Building a Closed-Loop…
  • Why Spine’s Commercial Model Needs a Reset? The real…
  • Boston Scientific Puts $1.5 Billion on MiRus: Why…
  • What Is Medtronic’s PILAR™ Technique?
  • Globus Medical: Strong Q1, Weak Stock Reaction — Is…
  • (2025 Update): Market, Leading FDA-Approved Devices,…
  • (UPDATED 2025): 6 Artificial Cervical Discs You’ll…
  • COMPANIES
  • Single-Use Spine Surgery Systems: The Future or…
  • Modular Pedicle Screws: When Adaptability Becomes…
  • BoxSPINE Receives FDA Clearance for Rodless Spinal…
  • (UPDATED 2026) More Than 100 Options, No Single…
  • Orthofix Realigns Spine Leadership to Strengthen…
  • VB Spine Announces Successful First Clinical Cases…
  • Cervical Fusion Implant Denials: Why Spine Societies…
  • From Early Innovations to Modern Practice: Where Are…
  • VB Spine Announces VB Spine Solutions, a…
  • Top 60+ Minimally Invasive Sacroiliac Joint Fusion…
  • Johnson & Johnson Explores Potential $20B Sale…
  • Hospital Access Is Gone. What Comes Next for Spine…
  • Expandable cages were adopted not because they fused…
  • ATEC’s Valence: Robotics in Service of a Procedural Strategy
  • Orthofix Discontinues M6-C™ and M6-L™ Artificial…
  • Globus Medical Reports First Quarter 2026 Results
  • Autonomous Pedicle Screw Placement: Is Spine…
  • +10 Anterior Buttress Plates to Know…! | Updated 2026
  • LAST 5 VIDEOS PUBLISHED

    1. Syntropiq: Lyra
    2. ATEC Spine: SafeOp®
    3. REACH Medical: Expandable PLIF/TLIF Cage
    4. Expanding Innovations: X-PAC®TLIF 
    5. SI-BONE: iFuse INTRA Ti™ Implant System

    Footer

    Contact us:

    spinemarketgroup@gmail.com info@thespinemarketgroup.com

    • LinkedIn
    • Twitter
    • YouTube

    PRIVACY POLICY

    • Legal
    • PRODUCT LIBRARY

    Copyright © 2026 · SPINEMarketGroup