• Skip to main content
  • Skip to secondary menu
  • Skip to primary sidebar
  • Skip to footer
  • MANUFACTURERS
  • HEADHUNTERS
  • PRODUCT SECTIONS
  • COMPANIES

SPINEMarketGroup

Spine Industry News

  • HOME
  • 2025
  • 2024
  • BROCHURES
  • ARTICLES
  • VIDEOS

Woman drops lawsuit against Drobot hospital over “counterfeit” spinal screws

April 25, 2016 By SPINEMarketGroup

SANTA ANA, Calif., April, 2016 /PRNewswire/ — An Orange County woman has dismissed her lawsuit against HealthSmart Pacific, former owner of Pacific Hospital of Long Beach, after it was revealed that the spinal implants used in her surgery were not counterfeit, as she alleged in the wake of similar, highly publicized claims by a group of California plaintiff attorneys.

Elizabeth Montes filed a lawsuit in January 2015 in Orange County Superior Court against her surgeons and HealthSmart Pacific, claiming that her ongoing back pain was related to the use of counterfeit spinal implants. Montes’ lawsuit came after widespread publicity from 2014 lawsuits led by three plaintiff law firms that alleged a vast conspiracy by a medical-device supplier using “counterfeit” spinal implants manufactured in a machine shop in Temecula.

Those allegations were aimed in part at Michael D. Drobot, a former executive with Pacific Hospital of Long Beach and medical-device supplier International Implants. Drobot had pleaded guilty in 2014 to paying physicians to schedule surgeries at Pacific Hospital of Long Beach, but strongly denied ever acquiring or using counterfeit spinal implants.

“As I have said repeatedly, we did not buy or use implants that were not cleared by the FDA, and this case is an example of that,” Drobot said. “The plaintiff attorneys behind this so-called conspiracy have frightened a lot of people who had surgery at PHLB, and panicked them for no valid reason. At no time did our company or Pacific Hospital of Long Beach use counterfeit medical devices.”

Montes, a former waitress who suffered back pain after an incident at work, underwent lumbar fusion surgery in October 2012.  After some time, the pain returned and her surgeon recommended that she have a second surgery.

Six months after filing her lawsuit, Montes had surgery and the implants were removed from her spine.

Representatives of the manufacturer, Alphatec, identified the spinal implants as legitimate devices with FDA clearance.

“These devices clearly were not counterfeit,” said Susan Garbutt, an attorney with Brobeck, West, Borges, Rosa and Douville inNewport Beach, counsel for HealthSmart Pacific. “When Ms. Montes’ attorney realized the implants were legitimate, he immediately dismissed the case.”

HealthSmart faced 32 similar cases in Los Angeles. A state court last year, based on challenges filed by HealthSmart’s counsel, dismissed conspiracy claims in 30 of those cases, finding that none of the surgeries cited in the complaints had occurred at Pacific Hospital of Long Beach.  Only two of those personal injury cases remain active.

SOURCE HealthSmart

(Visited 71 times, 19 visits today)

Filed Under: Legal, NEWS Tagged With: 2016, NEWS

Primary Sidebar

PLATINUM SPONSORS

GOLD SPONSORS

MOST POPULAR POSTS

  • BROCHURES
  • Just Reflective, Not Disappointed: Globus Medical’s…
  • (UPDATED 2025): 6 Artificial Cervical Discs You’ll…
  • What’s Happening with Globus Medical? Why Has the…
  • (UPDATED 2024): +8 Lumbar Artificial Discs to Know…
  • Stryker’s Spine Business Sale: A Smart Move or a…
  • Why Didn’t Globus Medical’s Stock Rise After…
  • Globus Medical extends versatility of Advanced…
  • Dispute Over Spinal Implant Royalties Between…
  • M6 Discontinued: What Are the Alternatives for a…
  • Globus Medical to Execute $500 Million Share Buyback…
  • Eminent Spine’s 3D Printed Titanium Pedicle Screw…
  • Orthofix Discontinues M6-C™ and M6-L™ Artificial…
  • Stryker’s Spine Exit: What It Means for…
  • Alphatec Today: Where It Stands and Where It’s Heading?
  • (Updated!) 15 Expandable PLIF Cages to Know…!
  • (UPDATED 2024): +108 Stand-Alone Cervical Cages to Know..!
  • Globus Medical Reports First Quarter 2025 Results
  • What Are the Strategic Reasons Behind Globus…
  • Viscogliosi Brothers Completes Acquisition of U.S.…
  • LAST 10 VIDEOS PUBLISHED

    1. Biedermann Motech: MOSS 100 (Short)
    2. POWEHI MEDICAL AG: KUDOS™ Modular
    3. POWEHI MEDICAL AG: TANTO® Screw
    4. Syntropiq: Taurus TLIF (Short)
    5. LEM Surgical: Dynamis Surgical Robot
    6. Aegis Spine:PathLoc-TA
    7. NGMedical: MOVE®-C Artificial Disc
    8. B.Braun Aesculap: Ennovate® Cervical MIS
    9. Spineart: PERLA® TL Deformity Solutions
    10. NGMedical: MOVE®-C

    Recent Comments

    • Sandy on Just Reflective, Not Disappointed: Globus Medical’s Bittersweet Q1 2025
    • SPINEMarketGroup on M6 Discontinued: What Are the Alternatives for a Cervical Artificial Disc?
    • Sergio López-Fombona on M6 Discontinued: What Are the Alternatives for a Cervical Artificial Disc?
    • Drew on Has Globus Already Surpassed Medtronic in the Spine Market? Can J&J Find Its Way Back to the Top?
    • Ahmed Hassan El-Naggary on Has Globus Already Surpassed Medtronic in the Spine Market? Can J&J Find Its Way Back to the Top?
    • Anonymous on Has Globus Already Surpassed Medtronic in the Spine Market? Can J&J Find Its Way Back to the Top?
    • Email
    • Twitter
    • YouTube

    Subscribe to Our Newsletter!

    Check your inbox or spam folder to confirm your subscription.

    Footer

    • Email
    • Twitter
    • YouTube

    Contact us:

    [email protected] [email protected]

    PRIVATE POLICY

    • Legal Advice
    • Embed Link
    • VIDEOS

    Copyright © 2025 · SPINEMarketGroup

    Manage Cookie Consent
    To provide the best experiences, we use technologies like cookies to store and/or access device information. Consenting to these technologies will allow us to process data such as browsing behavior or unique IDs on this site. Not consenting or withdrawing consent, may adversely affect certain features and functions.
    Functional Always active
    The technical storage or access is strictly necessary for the legitimate purpose of enabling the use of a specific service explicitly requested by the subscriber or user, or for the sole purpose of carrying out the transmission of a communication over an electronic communications network.
    Preferences
    The technical storage or access is necessary for the legitimate purpose of storing preferences that are not requested by the subscriber or user.
    Statistics
    The technical storage or access that is used exclusively for statistical purposes. The technical storage or access that is used exclusively for anonymous statistical purposes. Without a subpoena, voluntary compliance on the part of your Internet Service Provider, or additional records from a third party, information stored or retrieved for this purpose alone cannot usually be used to identify you.
    Marketing
    The technical storage or access is required to create user profiles to send advertising, or to track the user on a website or across several websites for similar marketing purposes.
    Manage options Manage services Manage {vendor_count} vendors Read more about these purposes
    View preferences
    {title} {title} {title}