• Skip to main content
  • Skip to secondary menu
  • Skip to primary sidebar
  • Skip to footer
  • MANUFACTURERS
  • HEADHUNTERS
  • PRODUCT SECTIONS
  • COMPANIES

SPINEMarketGroup

Spine Industry News

  • HOME
  • 2025
  • 2024
  • BROCHURES
  • ARTICLES
  • VIDEOS

Neurosurgeon sentenced to almost 20 years for $2.8 million healthcare fraud involving harmful surgeries

January 13, 2017 By SPINEMarketGroup

A neurosurgeon in Michigan this week was sentenced to nearly 20 years in prison after pleading guilty to a $2.8 million health care fraud scheme in which he performed unnecessary invasive spinal surgeries.

Dr. Aria Sabit plead guilty to 4 counts of health care fraud, 1 count of conspiracy to commit health care fraud and 1 count of unlawful distribution of a controlled substance, according to a Department of Justice release. Dr. Sabit’s activities resulted in significant losses to Medicare, Medicaid and various private insurance companies.

As part of his guilty plea, Dr. Sabit admitted to receiving nearly $440,000 in financial incentives from Reliance Medical distributor Apex Medical by using more spinal implant devices than medically necessary to treat patients. The excessive use of devices resulted in extra sales revenue for apex, but also in serious bodily injuries to treated patients.

In his case, Dr. Sabit also admitted to convincing patients to undergo spinal fusion surgeries with devices designed to stabilize and strengthen the spine which he never performed. He did, however, bill public and price healthcare programs for the fraudulent services.

Dr. Sabit also admitted that, on select occasions, the money he received from Apex motivated him to “refer patients for unnecessary spine surgeries or for more complex procedures that they did not need,” according to the DoJ release.

In addition to the federal case, Dr. Sabit is still a defendant in 2 pending civil False Claims Act cases in the Central District of California.

The case ties into a 2014 case against Reliance Medical Systems, in which federal investigators claimed they had evidence that they have evidence that the company’s owners devised a kickback scheme to induce doctors to use Reliance spinal implants, even sometimes when patients didn’t need the procedure.

The Justice Dept. accused Reliance owners Brett Berry, John Hoffman and Adam Pike of using the company to create a physician-owned distributorship to funnel illegal payments to several physicians to reward them for using Reliance spinal implants.

“Allegedly, Reliance’s owners were recorded telling a potential Kronos investor that Reliance was formed as part of a plan to ‘get around’ the federal Anti-Kickback Statute, which prohibits such improper payments, and that Reliance pays its physician-investors enough in the first month or 2 to ‘put their kids through college,’” the DoJ reported.

(Visited 55 times, 21 visits today)

Filed Under: Legal, NEWS Tagged With: 2017, NEWS

Primary Sidebar

PLATINUM SPONSORS

GOLD SPONSORS

MOST POPULAR POSTS

  • Thinking About a Spine Robot? Your 2025 Guide to the…
  • BROCHURES
  • The Crown Is Still Medtronic’s… For Now!
  • Just Reflective, Not Disappointed: Globus Medical’s…
  • What’s Happening with Globus Medical? Why Has the…
  • After Diabetes, Could Medtronic’s Spine…
  • Top Expandable Cages of 2025: Which Lumbar Implants…
  • (UPDATED 2025): Starting Spine Endoscopy? Best…
  • (UPDATED 2024): +8 Lumbar Artificial Discs to Know…
  • Globus Medical to Execute $500 Million Share Buyback…
  • Eminent Spine’s 3D Printed Titanium Pedicle Screw…
  • Dispute Over Spinal Implant Royalties Between…
  • (UPDATED 2024): +108 Stand-Alone Cervical Cages to Know..!
  • Stryker’s Spine Business Sale: A Smart Move or a…
  • (Updated!) 15 Expandable PLIF Cages to Know…!
  • (UPDATED 2025): 6 Artificial Cervical Discs You’ll…
  • Globus Medical Reports First Quarter 2025 Results
  • Viscogliosi Brothers Completes Acquisition of U.S.…
  • Orthofix Discontinues M6-C™ and M6-L™ Artificial…
  • A New Player in Spinal Care, POWEHI Medical!
  • LAST 10 VIDEOS PUBLISHED

    1. Boston Scientific: Vertiflex Video Animation
    2. GetSet Surgical: GoPLF Implant overview
    3. GetSet Surgical: GoLif Implant Overview
    4. GetSet Surgical: GOlif instruments overview
    5. Alphatec Spine: ATEC PTP™ Corpectomy
    6. XACT ACE® Robotic System
    7. Perlove Medical: Spine Surgery Robot
    8. FUTURTEC: ORTHBOT Spinal ROBOT
    9. Biedermann Motech: MOSS 100 (Short)
    10. POWEHI MEDICAL AG: KUDOS™ Modular

    Recent Comments

    • Peter on Are single-use systems the inevitable future of spinal surgery—or merely a niche solution? What are the leading systems on the market?
    • Maurus Stoeckli on (UPDATED 2025): Starting Spine Endoscopy? Best Companies to Consider and Why the Market Is Heating Up!
    • Peter on Thinking About a Spine Robot? Your 2025 Guide to the Best Models, What’s Coming, Why You Need One, and Which Is Truly the Best?
    • Daniel on Thinking About a Spine Robot? Your 2025 Guide to the Best Models, What’s Coming, Why You Need One, and Which Is Truly the Best?
    • Peter on A New Player in Spinal Care, POWEHI Medical!
    • Sandy on Just Reflective, Not Disappointed: Globus Medical’s Bittersweet Q1 2025
    • Email
    • Twitter
    • YouTube

    Subscribe to Our Newsletter!

    Check your inbox or spam folder to confirm your subscription.

    Footer

    • Email
    • Twitter
    • YouTube

    Contact us:

    [email protected] [email protected]

    PRIVATE POLICY

    • Legal Advice
    • VIDEOS

    Copyright © 2025 · SPINEMarketGroup

    Manage Cookie Consent
    To provide the best experiences, we use technologies like cookies to store and/or access device information. Consenting to these technologies will allow us to process data such as browsing behavior or unique IDs on this site. Not consenting or withdrawing consent, may adversely affect certain features and functions.
    Functional Always active
    The technical storage or access is strictly necessary for the legitimate purpose of enabling the use of a specific service explicitly requested by the subscriber or user, or for the sole purpose of carrying out the transmission of a communication over an electronic communications network.
    Preferences
    The technical storage or access is necessary for the legitimate purpose of storing preferences that are not requested by the subscriber or user.
    Statistics
    The technical storage or access that is used exclusively for statistical purposes. The technical storage or access that is used exclusively for anonymous statistical purposes. Without a subpoena, voluntary compliance on the part of your Internet Service Provider, or additional records from a third party, information stored or retrieved for this purpose alone cannot usually be used to identify you.
    Marketing
    The technical storage or access is required to create user profiles to send advertising, or to track the user on a website or across several websites for similar marketing purposes.
    Manage options Manage services Manage {vendor_count} vendors Read more about these purposes
    View preferences
    {title} {title} {title}