• Skip to main content
  • Skip to secondary menu
  • Skip to primary sidebar
  • Skip to footer
  • MANUFACTURERS
  • HEADHUNTERS
  • PRODUCT SECTIONS
  • COMPANIES

SPINEMarketGroup

Spine Industry News

  • HOME
  • 2025
  • 2024
  • BROCHURES
  • ARTICLES
  • VIDEOS

Synthes USA files breach of contract claim against former sales rep for converting customers

January 21, 2013 By SPINEMarketGroup

A suburban Philadelphia manufacturer of medical devices has filed a civil action against a former employee that claims the man violated his contract with the plaintiff when he allegedly converted customers who formerly did business with the plaintiff to the new company at which the defendant was hired following his departure from his former company.Attorneys for Synthes USA Sales LLC, which is based in West Chester, Pa., filed suit Jan. 16 at the U.S. District Court in Philadelphia against Springdale, Ark. resident Bryan Bair.Bair, the lawsuit states, served as a sales consultant at the plaintiff’s Northwest Arkansas division where he was tasked with selling Synthes’ products to various healthcare providers, including large hospitals.Bair did so by “maintaining and establishing relationships with key physicians and hospital personnel who play a role in determining which implants and instrumentation are used in surgeries,” the complaint reads.Synthes is a worldwide leader in the design, manufacture and sale of medical devices, including instruments and implants used in orthopedic, spine and other surgeries.Bair had resigned from his position with Synthes on Sept. 30, 2012, effective immediately, the suit states, in order to take a similar position with Versa Med LLC, a distribution company that sells Synthes’ competitors’ products.While employed at Synthes, Bair was made to sign a confidentiality, non-solicitation and non-competition agreement, which prohibited Bair, both during his employment with Synthes and for a one-year period following his departure, from competing with Synthes in the territory to which he had been assigned by Synthes, and from soliciting Synthes’ customers, among other things, according to the complaint. Bair, however, did not abide by that agreement, the plaintiff contends.
“Based on information and belief, and despite his obligations under the Non-Competition Agreement, Bair immediately began to compete with Synthes and started converting business from Synthes in his former territory within the first week after he resigned from the company,” the lawsuit reads. “More recently, Synthes learned that Bair has subsequently converted the business of three major surgeons in his former territory from Synthes to competitor companies.”
The plaintiff claims that as a result of Bair’s conduct, the company has suffered a “substantial, adverse business impact, irreparable harms, lost customer relationships, goodwill in the marketplace and significant financial damage.”
Bair, the complaint shows, had worked as a sales consultant for Synthes from March 25, 1999 to Oct. 31, 2006, and then re-commenced his employment with the plaintiff as a sales consultant in Synthes’ Spine Division back in mid-November 2011.Before re-hiring Bair in late 2011, Synthes learned that Bair was subject to a non-competition agreement with his former employer, the suit states, and so the plaintiff assigned Bair to a sales territory that would allow the defendant to honor that agreement.It was that same type of agreement with Synthes that Bair is accused of violating in the present litigation.The complaint contains counts of breach of fiduciary duty and breach of contract.Synthes seeks injunctive relief prohibiting Bair from continuing to violate the non-competition agreement with the plaintiff.The company also seeks actual, incidental and consequential damages, attorney’s fees and other court relief.The plaintiff is being represented by attorneys Anthony B. Haller and Michael P. Broadhurst of the Philadelphia firm Blank Rome LLP.
Source:Jon Campisi.http://pennrecord.com/news

(Visited 43 times, 12 visits today)

Filed Under: Legal, NEWS Tagged With: 2013

Reader Interactions

Comments

  1. Anonymous says

    November 8, 2015 at 3:17 pm

    So true how Haller has been allowed by his corporate handlers to create an open ended check. Most lawsuits without merit. Simply using as a bully pulpit to intimidate and harass.

  2. Anonymous says

    November 8, 2015 at 3:17 pm

    I wonder when DePuy will stop allowing Haller to write his own invoices? I am not suggesting that many of these sales guys are not guilty. But, Haller has a reputation of suing ex-Synthes people regardless of merit.

Primary Sidebar

PLATINUM SPONSORS

GOLD SPONSORS

MOST POPULAR POSTS

  • BROCHURES
  • Just Reflective, Not Disappointed: Globus Medical’s…
  • (UPDATED 2025): 6 Artificial Cervical Discs You’ll…
  • What’s Happening with Globus Medical? Why Has the…
  • (UPDATED 2024): +8 Lumbar Artificial Discs to Know…
  • Stryker’s Spine Business Sale: A Smart Move or a…
  • Why Didn’t Globus Medical’s Stock Rise After…
  • Globus Medical extends versatility of Advanced…
  • Dispute Over Spinal Implant Royalties Between…
  • M6 Discontinued: What Are the Alternatives for a…
  • Eminent Spine’s 3D Printed Titanium Pedicle Screw…
  • Globus Medical to Execute $500 Million Share Buyback…
  • Orthofix Discontinues M6-C™ and M6-L™ Artificial…
  • Stryker’s Spine Exit: What It Means for…
  • Alphatec Today: Where It Stands and Where It’s Heading?
  • (Updated!) 15 Expandable PLIF Cages to Know…!
  • (UPDATED 2024): +108 Stand-Alone Cervical Cages to Know..!
  • Globus Medical Reports First Quarter 2025 Results
  • What Are the Strategic Reasons Behind Globus…
  • Has Globus Already Surpassed Medtronic in the Spine…
  • LAST 10 VIDEOS PUBLISHED

    1. Biedermann Motech: MOSS 100 (Short)
    2. POWEHI MEDICAL AG: KUDOS™ Modular
    3. POWEHI MEDICAL AG: TANTO® Screw
    4. Syntropiq: Taurus TLIF (Short)
    5. LEM Surgical: Dynamis Surgical Robot
    6. Aegis Spine:PathLoc-TA
    7. NGMedical: MOVE®-C Artificial Disc
    8. B.Braun Aesculap: Ennovate® Cervical MIS
    9. Spineart: PERLA® TL Deformity Solutions
    10. NGMedical: MOVE®-C

    Recent Comments

    • Sandy on Just Reflective, Not Disappointed: Globus Medical’s Bittersweet Q1 2025
    • SPINEMarketGroup on M6 Discontinued: What Are the Alternatives for a Cervical Artificial Disc?
    • Sergio López-Fombona on M6 Discontinued: What Are the Alternatives for a Cervical Artificial Disc?
    • Drew on Has Globus Already Surpassed Medtronic in the Spine Market? Can J&J Find Its Way Back to the Top?
    • Ahmed Hassan El-Naggary on Has Globus Already Surpassed Medtronic in the Spine Market? Can J&J Find Its Way Back to the Top?
    • Anonymous on Has Globus Already Surpassed Medtronic in the Spine Market? Can J&J Find Its Way Back to the Top?
    • Email
    • Twitter
    • YouTube

    Subscribe to Our Newsletter!

    Check your inbox or spam folder to confirm your subscription.

    Footer

    • Email
    • Twitter
    • YouTube

    Contact us:

    [email protected] [email protected]

    PRIVATE POLICY

    • Legal Advice
    • Embed Link
    • VIDEOS

    Copyright © 2025 · SPINEMarketGroup

    Manage Cookie Consent
    To provide the best experiences, we use technologies like cookies to store and/or access device information. Consenting to these technologies will allow us to process data such as browsing behavior or unique IDs on this site. Not consenting or withdrawing consent, may adversely affect certain features and functions.
    Functional Always active
    The technical storage or access is strictly necessary for the legitimate purpose of enabling the use of a specific service explicitly requested by the subscriber or user, or for the sole purpose of carrying out the transmission of a communication over an electronic communications network.
    Preferences
    The technical storage or access is necessary for the legitimate purpose of storing preferences that are not requested by the subscriber or user.
    Statistics
    The technical storage or access that is used exclusively for statistical purposes. The technical storage or access that is used exclusively for anonymous statistical purposes. Without a subpoena, voluntary compliance on the part of your Internet Service Provider, or additional records from a third party, information stored or retrieved for this purpose alone cannot usually be used to identify you.
    Marketing
    The technical storage or access is required to create user profiles to send advertising, or to track the user on a website or across several websites for similar marketing purposes.
    Manage options Manage services Manage {vendor_count} vendors Read more about these purposes
    View preferences
    {title} {title} {title}