• Skip to main content
  • Skip to secondary menu
  • Skip to primary sidebar
  • Skip to footer
  • MANUFACTURERS
  • HEADHUNTERS
  • PRODUCT SECTIONS
  • COMPANIES

SPINEMarketGroup

Spine Industry News

  • HOME
  • 2025
  • 2024
  • BROCHURES
  • ARTICLES
  • VIDEOS

Stryker’s Spine Business Sale: A Smart Move or a Missed Opportunity?

January 29, 2025 By SPINEMarketGroup

Stryker’s recent decision to divest its spinal implant business marks a significant shift in the medical device industry. This move allows the company to focus on higher-growth, more profitable segments like robotics and vascular medicine. However, it also will enable competitors to strengthen their position in the spine market. For VB Spine, success will depend on execution: If it can differentiate itself through innovation and a solid commercial strategy, it could establish itself as a key player in spinal surgery. If not, it may become a transitional business, ripe for acquisition by a larger industry player. Meanwhile, the spine market continues evolving towards more technological and cost-efficient solutions, with increasing consolidation and a growing focus on robotics, AI, and implant personalization.

Why Is Stryker Making This Move?

As the world’s second-largest orthopedic company, Stryker has a diverse portfolio spanning trauma, robotic surgery, and joint replacement technology. The sale of its spinal implant unit signals several key strategic shifts:

A. Divesting from a Slow-Growth, Highly Competitive Segment

The spinal implant market has experienced moderate growth compared to other medical device sectors. Despite advancements in minimally invasive and robotic-assisted spine surgery, it remains a price-sensitive segment with shrinking margins due to pressure from insurers and hospitals. In response, Stryker has identified better investment opportunities in areas such as robotic surgery, with the expansion of its Mako system for orthopedics and development of Mako Spine; vascular medicine, strengthening its position in high-growth thrombectomy through the $4.9 billion acquisition of Inari Medical; and advanced therapies, investing in smart medical devices and post-operative monitoring.

B.Prioritizing High-Growth Opportunities

By offloading a slower-growing business, Stryker can reallocate financial and operational resources to higher-margin, fast-growing sectors. This also removes the need to compete in a market where specialized players have taken the lead in innovation.

C. Reducing Complexity: Spine for Spine Specialists

The spine market is highly specialized and requires a deep understanding to navigate. It’s not a market for just any company, given its complexity, level of service, training needs, investment, and focus. This business is very different from others. As we’ve said many times before, it’s a market for companies that are fully dedicated to it. That’s likely why Globus has become the leader in this space. Where do J&J, Zimmer, Stryker, and even Medtronic fit in? All of them seem to be struggling in this market.

D. Strengthening Strategic Positioning Against Competitors

Exiting the spinal implant business enables Stryker to focus on consolidating its leadership in robotics and joint replacements. This is particularly relevant as competitors like Medtronic and Globus Medical are into spine robotics, where Stryker has yet to establish dominance. By stepping away from traditional implants, the company can concentrate on providing technology-driven spine surgery solutions without managing its implant portfolio.

Why Did Viscogliosi Brothers Acquire This Business? What Are the Benefits and Challenges?

VB Spine, backed by Viscogliosi Brothers, has acquired an established portfolio with distribution channels and an existing customer base in the spine market. The key question is whether it can turn this acquisition into a sustainable competitive advantage.

Why Did VB Spine Make This Purchase?

VB Spine made this purchase to strengthen its focus on spinal surgery by dedicating all its efforts to this segment with a more agile, surgeon-centric approach, unlike Stryker, where the spine division was just one part of a diversified portfolio. This acquisition also presents an opportunity for accelerated growth, as VB Spine can inject new life into the product line through fresh investments in R&D and strategic partnerships, while gaining exclusive access to Stryker’s technologies, such as Mako Spine and Copilot, providing an initial technological edge in robotic-assisted spine surgery.

Key Challenges for VB Spine

Competing against industry giants like Medtronic, Globus Medical, and DePuy Synthes, which have strong market positions supported by robotics, AI, and advanced materials, VB Spine faces the challenge of differentiating itself through innovation and pricing. As an investment firm, Viscogliosi Brothers has made multiple acquisitions in the spine sector. Now,  the real test lies in transforming this purchase into a long-term profitable business rather than a short-term asset flip. While VB Spine inherits Stryker’s sales infrastructure, retaining and expanding those relationships will be key to its success, shaping its impact on the global spine market.

What Does This Mean for the Global Spine Implant Market?

Stryker’s exit from spinal implants could accelerate consolidation in the industry, with companies like Globus Medical (following its acquisition of NuVasive) and Medtronic expanding their market share, while VB Spine may seek alliances or become an acquisition target for a larger player. As robotic-assisted surgery, advanced navigation, and 3D-printed personalized implants become more widely adopted, innovation will drive market leadership, with Medtronic’s Mazor X and Globus’s ExcelsiusGPS setting the standard for spine robotics. VB Spine must decide whether to compete in this segment or focus on conventional implants with a unique value proposition. Meanwhile, cost pressures and reimbursement challenges continue to reshape healthcare, as some companies focus on premium innovation and others pursue lower-cost strategies in an increasingly saturated market. VB Spine must carefully position itself within this evolving landscape. Stryker’s decision to exit the spinal implant business is a calculated move to optimize its portfolio and focus on high-growth, high-margin segments. VB Spine, on the other hand, sees an opportunity to become a specialized player in spine surgery. Its success will depend on its ability to innovate and execute a strong commercial strategy, while the broader spine market continues to evolve with increasing consolidation, technological disruption, and shifting competitive dynamics. Whether VB Spine emerges as a long-term contender or a short-term transition player remains to be seen.

###

(Visited 4,568 times, 1,150 visits today)

Filed Under: ARTICLES, NEWS Tagged With: 2025

Primary Sidebar

PLATINUM SPONSORS

GOLD SPONSORS

MOST POPULAR POSTS

  • BROCHURES
  • Just Reflective, Not Disappointed: Globus Medical’s…
  • (UPDATED 2025): 6 Artificial Cervical Discs You’ll…
  • What’s Happening with Globus Medical? Why Has the…
  • (UPDATED 2024): +8 Lumbar Artificial Discs to Know…
  • Stryker’s Spine Business Sale: A Smart Move or a…
  • Why Didn’t Globus Medical’s Stock Rise After…
  • Stryker’s Spine Exit: What It Means for…
  • Globus Medical extends versatility of Advanced…
  • Dispute Over Spinal Implant Royalties Between…
  • M6 Discontinued: What Are the Alternatives for a…
  • Eminent Spine’s 3D Printed Titanium Pedicle Screw…
  • Orthofix Discontinues M6-C™ and M6-L™ Artificial…
  • (UPDATED 2024): +108 Stand-Alone Cervical Cages to Know..!
  • (Updated!) 15 Expandable PLIF Cages to Know…!
  • Alphatec Today: Where It Stands and Where It’s Heading?
  • What Are the Strategic Reasons Behind Globus…
  • Globus Medical Reports First Quarter 2025 Results
  • Has Globus Already Surpassed Medtronic in the Spine…
  • Viscogliosi Brothers Completes Acquisition of U.S.…
  • LAST 10 VIDEOS PUBLISHED

    1. Biedermann Motech: MOSS 100 (Short)
    2. POWEHI MEDICAL AG: KUDOS™ Modular
    3. POWEHI MEDICAL AG: TANTO® Screw
    4. Syntropiq: Taurus TLIF (Short)
    5. LEM Surgical: Dynamis Surgical Robot
    6. Aegis Spine:PathLoc-TA
    7. NGMedical: MOVE®-C Artificial Disc
    8. B.Braun Aesculap: Ennovate® Cervical MIS
    9. Spineart: PERLA® TL Deformity Solutions
    10. NGMedical: MOVE®-C

    Recent Comments

    • Sandy on Just Reflective, Not Disappointed: Globus Medical’s Bittersweet Q1 2025
    • SPINEMarketGroup on M6 Discontinued: What Are the Alternatives for a Cervical Artificial Disc?
    • Sergio López-Fombona on M6 Discontinued: What Are the Alternatives for a Cervical Artificial Disc?
    • Drew on Has Globus Already Surpassed Medtronic in the Spine Market? Can J&J Find Its Way Back to the Top?
    • Ahmed Hassan El-Naggary on Has Globus Already Surpassed Medtronic in the Spine Market? Can J&J Find Its Way Back to the Top?
    • Anonymous on Has Globus Already Surpassed Medtronic in the Spine Market? Can J&J Find Its Way Back to the Top?
    • Email
    • Twitter
    • YouTube

    Subscribe to Our Newsletter!

    Check your inbox or spam folder to confirm your subscription.

    Footer

    • Email
    • Twitter
    • YouTube

    Contact us:

    [email protected] [email protected]

    PRIVATE POLICY

    • Legal Advice
    • Embed Link
    • VIDEOS

    Copyright © 2025 · SPINEMarketGroup

    Manage Cookie Consent
    To provide the best experiences, we use technologies like cookies to store and/or access device information. Consenting to these technologies will allow us to process data such as browsing behavior or unique IDs on this site. Not consenting or withdrawing consent, may adversely affect certain features and functions.
    Functional Always active
    The technical storage or access is strictly necessary for the legitimate purpose of enabling the use of a specific service explicitly requested by the subscriber or user, or for the sole purpose of carrying out the transmission of a communication over an electronic communications network.
    Preferences
    The technical storage or access is necessary for the legitimate purpose of storing preferences that are not requested by the subscriber or user.
    Statistics
    The technical storage or access that is used exclusively for statistical purposes. The technical storage or access that is used exclusively for anonymous statistical purposes. Without a subpoena, voluntary compliance on the part of your Internet Service Provider, or additional records from a third party, information stored or retrieved for this purpose alone cannot usually be used to identify you.
    Marketing
    The technical storage or access is required to create user profiles to send advertising, or to track the user on a website or across several websites for similar marketing purposes.
    Manage options Manage services Manage {vendor_count} vendors Read more about these purposes
    View preferences
    {title} {title} {title}