• Skip to main content
  • Skip to secondary menu
  • Skip to primary sidebar
  • Skip to footer
  • MANUFACTURERS
  • HEADHUNTERS
  • PRODUCT SECTIONS
  • COMPANIES

SPINEMarketGroup

Spine Industry News

  • HOME
  • 2025
  • 2024
  • BROCHURES
  • ARTICLES
  • VIDEOS

Spinal Implant Prices Vary, Process Drives Up Costs

March 25, 2013 By SPINEMarketGroup

CHICAGO — Wide variations exist in the cost of the screws, plates, and cages for spinal implants, which contributes to the escalating costs of surgery and healthcare overall, a researcher said here.
Currently, hospitals and manufacturers negotiate the price, but individual hospitals are not permitted to share what they’ve agreed on with other centers, reported Samuel Bederman, MD, PhD, and Sohrab Pahlavan, MD, both of the University of California Irvine.
“One hospital can’t just call up another and ask what they are paying for a specific type of implant in the hope of getting the same price,” Bederman said.Surgeons too are unaware of the costs, and usually choose the specific product according to preference, Bederman explained in a press briefing at the annual meeting of the American Academy of Orthopaedic Surgeons.With the goal of determining the degree of variation in the costs of three specific types of spinal implants — pedicle screws, anterior cervical plates, and posterior interbody cages — Bederman’s group examined hospital purchasing records for a large consortium of academic medical centers across the country.A total of 181 records were available from 45 centers for pedicle screws, 158 records from 41 centers for cervical plates, and 102 from 33 centers for the interbody cages.The mean price of a pedicle screw was $878, while the range was $400 to $1,843, Bederman reported.For anterior cervical plates, the mean price per item was $1,068, with a range of $540 to $2,388.And for the interbody cages, where the mean was $2,975, there was an almost eight-fold variation in cost for the very same type of device, with ranges from $938 to $7,200.In a regression analysis, he identified a correlation between the price of implants and the volume purchased by the hospital.
For each additional implant used, the decreases in price were:
Pedicle screw: $0.28 (P=0.0044)
Anterior cervical plates: $4.33 (P=0.0011)
Interbody cages: $6.86 (P=0.0011)
It wasn’t a tremendous reduction in price, however, and the correlation wasn’t perfect. Some low-volume centers had low costs, he noted.With current cost containment trends, the sustainability of prices for these implants is unclear.
“But what is needed today is more transparency in the system,” Bederman said. “We’re all in this together — hospitals, surgeons, and implant companies. This closed-door policy of no one telling anyone else what implants cost needs to be addressed to reduce some of the variation and to help limit healthcare expenditures overall.”
Source:Nancy Walsh, Staff Writer, MedPage Today.Reviewed by Robert Jasmer, MD; Associate Clinical Professor of Medicine, University of California, San Francisco.Primary Sources:American Academy of Orthopedic SurgeonsBederman S, Pahlavan S “Variation in costs of spinal implants” AAOS 2013; Abstract 811.

(Visited 20 times, 9 visits today)

Filed Under: NEWS Tagged With: 2013

Primary Sidebar

PLATINUM SPONSORS

GOLD SPONSORS

MOST POPULAR POSTS

  • BROCHURES
  • (UPDATED 2025): 6 Artificial Cervical Discs You’ll…
  • What’s Happening with Globus Medical? Why Has the…
  • Just Reflective, Not Disappointed: Globus Medical’s…
  • (UPDATED 2024): +8 Lumbar Artificial Discs to Know…
  • Stryker’s Spine Business Sale: A Smart Move or a…
  • Stryker’s Spine Exit: What It Means for…
  • Why Didn’t Globus Medical’s Stock Rise After…
  • Globus Medical extends versatility of Advanced…
  • M6 Discontinued: What Are the Alternatives for a…
  • Dispute Over Spinal Implant Royalties Between…
  • Eminent Spine’s 3D Printed Titanium Pedicle Screw…
  • Orthofix Discontinues M6-C™ and M6-L™ Artificial…
  • Alphatec Today: Where It Stands and Where It’s Heading?
  • (Updated!) 15 Expandable PLIF Cages to Know…!
  • (UPDATED 2024): +108 Stand-Alone Cervical Cages to Know..!
  • What Are the Strategic Reasons Behind Globus…
  • Globus Medical Reports First Quarter 2025 Results
  • Update:Stay Tuned Next Week! Is Globus Medical the…
  • Has Globus Already Surpassed Medtronic in the Spine…
  • LAST 10 VIDEOS PUBLISHED

    1. POWEHI MEDICAL AG: TANTO® Screw
    2. Syntropiq: Taurus TLIF (Short)
    3. LEM Surgical: Dynamis Surgical Robot
    4. Aegis Spine:PathLoc-TA
    5. NGMedical: MOVE®-C Artificial Disc
    6. B.Braun Aesculap: Ennovate® Cervical MIS
    7. Spineart: PERLA® TL Deformity Solutions
    8. NGMedical: MOVE®-C
    9. Normmed Medical: ALIF Peek Cage
    10. PainTEQ: LinQ Sacroiliac

    Recent Comments

    • Sandy on Just Reflective, Not Disappointed: Globus Medical’s Bittersweet Q1 2025
    • SPINEMarketGroup on M6 Discontinued: What Are the Alternatives for a Cervical Artificial Disc?
    • Sergio López-Fombona on M6 Discontinued: What Are the Alternatives for a Cervical Artificial Disc?
    • Drew on Has Globus Already Surpassed Medtronic in the Spine Market? Can J&J Find Its Way Back to the Top?
    • Ahmed Hassan El-Naggary on Has Globus Already Surpassed Medtronic in the Spine Market? Can J&J Find Its Way Back to the Top?
    • Anonymous on Has Globus Already Surpassed Medtronic in the Spine Market? Can J&J Find Its Way Back to the Top?
    • Email
    • Twitter
    • YouTube

    Subscribe to Our Newsletter!

    Check your inbox or spam folder to confirm your subscription.

    Footer

    • Email
    • Twitter
    • YouTube

    Contact us:

    [email protected] [email protected]

    PRIVATE POLICY

    • Legal Advice
    • Embed Link
    • VIDEOS

    Copyright © 2025 · SPINEMarketGroup

    Manage Cookie Consent
    To provide the best experiences, we use technologies like cookies to store and/or access device information. Consenting to these technologies will allow us to process data such as browsing behavior or unique IDs on this site. Not consenting or withdrawing consent, may adversely affect certain features and functions.
    Functional Always active
    The technical storage or access is strictly necessary for the legitimate purpose of enabling the use of a specific service explicitly requested by the subscriber or user, or for the sole purpose of carrying out the transmission of a communication over an electronic communications network.
    Preferences
    The technical storage or access is necessary for the legitimate purpose of storing preferences that are not requested by the subscriber or user.
    Statistics
    The technical storage or access that is used exclusively for statistical purposes. The technical storage or access that is used exclusively for anonymous statistical purposes. Without a subpoena, voluntary compliance on the part of your Internet Service Provider, or additional records from a third party, information stored or retrieved for this purpose alone cannot usually be used to identify you.
    Marketing
    The technical storage or access is required to create user profiles to send advertising, or to track the user on a website or across several websites for similar marketing purposes.
    Manage options Manage services Manage {vendor_count} vendors Read more about these purposes
    View preferences
    {title} {title} {title}