• Skip to main content
  • Skip to secondary menu
  • Skip to primary sidebar
  • Skip to footer
  • MANUFACTURERS
  • HEADHUNTERS
  • PRODUCT SECTIONS
  • COMPANIES

SPINEMarketGroup

Spine Industry News

  • HOME
  • 2025
  • 2024
  • BROCHURES
  • ARTICLES
  • VIDEOS

Rare charges accuse CEO of over-billing San Jose for spinal implants

April 27, 2012 By SPINEMarketGroup

In a YouTube video on her website, Trudy Maurer offers spinal injury patients help as they “navigate through the maze of bureaucracy” for insurance coverage. Her company advertises key spinal implants at no cost to hospitals.But there was one crucial detail she left out, South Bay prosecutors said: Maurer and her company were drastically overbilling Santa Clara County and San Jose taxpayers for the cost of spinal implants for government employees, allowing her to profit tens of thousands of dollars while the public agencies were forced to compensate by jacking up workers’ compensation premiums.The Santa Clara County District Attorney’s Office on Wednesday announced criminal charges against Maurer, 67, and her company’s medical director, 39-year-old Tigran Shahsuvarya. Though prosecutors say this type of fraud may be somewhat common, it’s believed to be one of the first criminal cases of its kind in the state because investigations into the activity are so painstaking and the practice often flies under the radar.
“Medical scams are a big problem in the insurance industry,” said deputy district attorney Katharina Wells. “Billing fraud can be very difficult to prove.”
Reached Wednesday at the San Francisco office of her company, Implantium, which is still apparently in operation, Maurer said her attorney, Richard Moss, advised her not to comment. But Moss praised Maurer as a law-abiding citizen with 12 years in the industry.
“Frankly, I’m very confident that Trudy is not guilty of any criminal wrongdoing here,” Moss said, adding that he wanted to review the evidence before commenting on the specific charges.The attorney for Shahsuvarya, who is alleged to have participated in the scheme and is also free on bail, could not immediately be reached for comment Wednesday.Maurer also is the CEO of the Spine Network of California, which operates out of the same office as Implantium and promotes itself as a service to connect patients with spine surgeons and help patients clear their insurance requirements.If convicted, the San Francisco residents could face up to 13 years in prison and up to $450,000 in fines plus restitution. They will each appear in court next week for the first time to face nine felony fraud charges apiece.Implantium works as the billing company for spinal surgeries, buying implant devices from manufacturers and supplying them to hospitals without actually ever handling the products, prosecutors said. The hospitals implant the devices into the backs of injured workers, and Implantium recovers its cost of the product by billing the patients’ workers’ compensation insurance carriers.By law, companies like Implantium are allowed to profit up to $250 per device, prosecutors say. But Maurer is accused of altering invoices for the implants by as much as tens of thousands of dollars, allowing her to receive compensation from the insurance carriers that went way beyond what they paid for the device, prosecutors said. In this case, the invoices, dating back to 2008, were sent to the county of Santa Clara and the city of San Jose, which are self-insured for workers’ compensation.Wells said her office is working with prosecutors in Los Angeles, San Diego and Sonoma counties, where the pair are suspected of defrauding two large, private insurance companies.But Moss said a ruling in October 2008 allowed non-hospital companies like Implantium to collect fees over $250.”If you stuck to that, you’d be out of business before you blink an eye,” Moss said, while acknowledging that overbilling, if proved, would still constitute fraud.All companies — not just government agencies — are required to have workers’ compensation insurance in California. When they are overbilled, their rates rise — usually causing them to pass the cost onto employees and customers.Wells says prosecutors rarely file charges in these types of cases because it is so time-intensive to prove. It takes a sharp eye and then an audit; in this case, a San Jose city attorney noticed something amiss in their billing.”These scams are probably one of the largest cost drivers involving workers’ compensation fraud,” Donald Marshall, chairman of the state Fraud Assessment Commission, said in a statement on the case. “Any time a provider or a person bills the workers’ compensation system in excess of what should be paid, then it impacts every employer in California because (it) impacts their rates.”
Source:Mike [email protected]

(Visited 26 times, 3 visits today)

Filed Under: 2012, OLD ARCHIVES Tagged With: 2012

Primary Sidebar

PLATINUM SPONSORS

GOLD SPONSORS

MOST POPULAR POSTS

  • BROCHURES
  • Thinking About a Spine Robot? Your 2025 Guide to the…
  • Just Reflective, Not Disappointed: Globus Medical’s…
  • The Crown Is Still Medtronic’s… For Now!
  • What’s Happening with Globus Medical? Why Has the…
  • After Diabetes, Could Medtronic’s Spine…
  • Top Expandable Cages of 2025: Which Lumbar Implants…
  • (UPDATED 2024): +8 Lumbar Artificial Discs to Know…
  • Globus Medical to Execute $500 Million Share Buyback…
  • Eminent Spine’s 3D Printed Titanium Pedicle Screw…
  • Globus Medical extends versatility of Advanced…
  • Dispute Over Spinal Implant Royalties Between…
  • M6 Discontinued: What Are the Alternatives for a…
  • (UPDATED 2025): 6 Artificial Cervical Discs You’ll…
  • Stryker’s Spine Business Sale: A Smart Move or a…
  • (UPDATED 2024): +108 Stand-Alone Cervical Cages to Know..!
  • (Updated!) 15 Expandable PLIF Cages to Know…!
  • Globus Medical Reports First Quarter 2025 Results
  • Orthofix Discontinues M6-C™ and M6-L™ Artificial…
  • Viscogliosi Brothers Completes Acquisition of U.S.…
  • LAST 10 VIDEOS PUBLISHED

    1. Alphatec Spine: ATEC PTP™ Corpectomy
    2. XACT ACE® Robotic System
    3. Perlove Medical: Spine Surgery Robot
    4. FUTURTEC: ORTHBOT Spinal ROBOT
    5. Biedermann Motech: MOSS 100 (Short)
    6. POWEHI MEDICAL AG: KUDOS™ Modular
    7. POWEHI MEDICAL AG: TANTO® Screw
    8. Syntropiq: Taurus TLIF (Short)
    9. LEM Surgical: Dynamis Surgical Robot
    10. Aegis Spine:PathLoc-TA

    Recent Comments

    • Peter on Thinking About a Spine Robot? Your 2025 Guide to the Best Models, What’s Coming, Why You Need One, and Which Is Truly the Best?
    • Daniel on Thinking About a Spine Robot? Your 2025 Guide to the Best Models, What’s Coming, Why You Need One, and Which Is Truly the Best?
    • Peter on A New Player in Spinal Care, POWEHI Medical!
    • Sandy on Just Reflective, Not Disappointed: Globus Medical’s Bittersweet Q1 2025
    • SPINEMarketGroup on M6 Discontinued: What Are the Alternatives for a Cervical Artificial Disc?
    • Sergio López-Fombona on M6 Discontinued: What Are the Alternatives for a Cervical Artificial Disc?
    • Email
    • Twitter
    • YouTube

    Subscribe to Our Newsletter!

    Check your inbox or spam folder to confirm your subscription.

    Footer

    • Email
    • Twitter
    • YouTube

    Contact us:

    [email protected] [email protected]

    PRIVATE POLICY

    • Legal Advice
    • Embed Link
    • VIDEOS

    Copyright © 2025 · SPINEMarketGroup

    Manage Cookie Consent
    To provide the best experiences, we use technologies like cookies to store and/or access device information. Consenting to these technologies will allow us to process data such as browsing behavior or unique IDs on this site. Not consenting or withdrawing consent, may adversely affect certain features and functions.
    Functional Always active
    The technical storage or access is strictly necessary for the legitimate purpose of enabling the use of a specific service explicitly requested by the subscriber or user, or for the sole purpose of carrying out the transmission of a communication over an electronic communications network.
    Preferences
    The technical storage or access is necessary for the legitimate purpose of storing preferences that are not requested by the subscriber or user.
    Statistics
    The technical storage or access that is used exclusively for statistical purposes. The technical storage or access that is used exclusively for anonymous statistical purposes. Without a subpoena, voluntary compliance on the part of your Internet Service Provider, or additional records from a third party, information stored or retrieved for this purpose alone cannot usually be used to identify you.
    Marketing
    The technical storage or access is required to create user profiles to send advertising, or to track the user on a website or across several websites for similar marketing purposes.
    Manage options Manage services Manage {vendor_count} vendors Read more about these purposes
    View preferences
    {title} {title} {title}