• Skip to main content
  • Skip to secondary menu
  • Skip to primary sidebar
  • Skip to footer
  • MANUFACTURERS
  • HEADHUNTERS
  • PRODUCT SECTIONS
  • COMPANIES

SPINEMarketGroup

Spine Industry News

  • HOME
  • 2025
  • 2024
  • BROCHURES
  • ARTICLES
  • VIDEOS

Providence Medical Technology Announces New Publication Demonstrating High Fusion Rates and Successful Outcomes in Previously Failed Cervical Fusion Patients

December 7, 2023 By SPINEMarketGroup

PLEASANTON, Calif., Dec. 7, 2023 /PRNewswire/ — Providence Medical Technology, Inc., a medical device innovator focused on improving surgical outcomes for high-risk spine surgery patients, today announced a new publication in the Journal of Clinical Neuroscience. Dr. Michael M. Haglund and colleagues authored the publication on the long-term outcomes of patients undergoing tissue-sparing Posterior Cervical Fusion (PCF) to revise a 1-level pseudarthrosis following a failed Anterior Cervical Discectomy and Fusion (ACDF).

There are over 300,000 cervical fusion procedures performed each year, with over 40% involving patients with some form of risk factors for nonunion. While safe and effective for most patients, a common complication is pseudarthrosis, a failure of the bones to heal and fuse after surgery. Risk factors that contribute to pseudarthrosis include multi-level disease, poor bone quality, smoking, diabetes, and insufficient immobilization. When pseudarthrosis occurs, patients can experience severe pain and neurological issues, which often necessitate another surgical intervention. This second “revision” surgery can be more complex and carry increased risks and complications.

The Journal of Clinical Neuroscience publication presents long-term data on forty-five patients enrolled from six sites across the United States who had a failed cervical fusion surgery (ACDF) and were subsequently revised with a tissue-sparing posterior cervical fusion using Providence Medical Technology’s CORUS™ Spinal System and CAVUX® FFS.

Key findings from the study include:

  • High Success Rate: Surgeons observed complete fusion (bone healing) in 91% of cases. An independent core imaging lab observed motion less than two degrees in 93% of cases and verified continuous bridging bone across the treated joints in 80% of patients.
  • High Satisfaction Rate: 74% of subjects reported satisfaction with their revision surgery outcomes.
  • Reduced Surgery Time, Blood Loss, & Hospital Stay: Tissue-sparing PCF had a median procedure time of 49 minutes, an estimated blood loss of just 10 cc, and a median hospital stay of one day.
  • No Hospital Re-admission or Subsequent Surgical Interventions: None of the patients in the study went on to an additional surgery or re-admission following their tissue-sparing revision procedure with a median follow-up time of over three years.

CAVUX® FFS is a unique surgical implant constructed of a CAVUX Cervical Cage and an ALLY® Bone Screw. Two FFS devices are implanted bilaterally through the back of the neck and span the facet joints to provide immobilization and stabilization as an adjunct to posterior cervical fusion. CAVUX FFS is “indicated for patients requiring a revision for an anterior pseudarthrosis at one level, from C3 to C7, with autogenous and/or allogenic bone graft.” CAVUX FFS is implanted using the company’s flagship CORUS™ Spinal System, which enables a surgeon to perform a tissue-sparing posterior cervical fusion before placing implants.

“Tissue-sparing posterior cervical fusion with CORUS™ Spinal System and CAVUX® FFS has become my preferred approach to treating patients after a failed anterior fusion,” said Dr. Michael M. Haglund, Endowed Professor of Neurosurgery and Orthopaedic Surgery at Duke University and lead author of the publication. “I am pleased to publish this new evidence demonstrating positive results in this difficult to treat patient population.”

“Failed spine surgery is a huge problem for everyone involved,” Providence CEO and Co-founder Jeff Smith noted. “High-risk spinal fusion patients suffer nonunion rates much higher than most people realize and often require revision surgery. We believe this is not acceptable and are driven to prevent these failures for all patients. Our tissue-sparing posterior fusion technology is a great option to treat these patients, as is well demonstrated in this study. We also believe the best way to fix surgical failures among high-risk spinal fusion patients is to prevent them from happening in the first place. We look forward to sharing our FUSE study data in the coming months for this application. I am so thankful for the support of all of our research partners for both of these studies. They are truly dedicated to solving this unmet clinical need for high-risk patients.”

Providence Medical Technology devices have been used to treat over 20,000 patients and are currently available in over 2,500 hospitals in the United States. 

About Providence Medical Technology, Inc.

Providence Medical Technology, Inc. is a privately held medical device company focused on innovative and tissue-sparing surgical solutions for cervical spine surgery. Its purpose is to improve clinical outcomes for high-risk patients and prevent surgical failures of the cervical spine. Its mission is to establish Circumferential Cervical Fusion (CCF) as the standard of care for high-risk patients. The Company has pioneered a proprietary approach to posterior cervical and lumbar fusion and has developed surgical instrumentation and implants that address the unmet clinical need of and offer unique benefits to the $2 billion worldwide cervical spine market.

The Providence family of products includes the CORUS™ Spinal System, CAVUX® intervertebral implants, and ALLY® bone and facet screws. All implants and instruments are sterile-packaged and single-use to maximize perioperative efficiency and ensure consistent quality and performance.

View the clinical publication: Long-term outcomes in patients treated with tissue-sparing posterior cervical fusion to revise a 1-level pseudarthrosis following ACDF

SOURCE Providence Medical Technology, Inc.

(Visited 181 times, 8 visits today)

Filed Under: NEWS Tagged With: 2023, NEWS

Primary Sidebar

PLATINUM SPONSORS

GOLD SPONSORS

MOST POPULAR POSTS

  • BROCHURES
  • Stryker’s Spine Exit: What It Means for…
  • (UPDATED 2025): 6 Artificial Cervical Discs You’ll…
  • What’s Happening with Globus Medical? Why Has the…
  • Stryker’s Spine Business Sale: A Smart Move or a…
  • (UPDATED 2024): +8 Lumbar Artificial Discs to Know…
  • Why Didn’t Globus Medical’s Stock Rise After…
  • Update:Stay Tuned Next Week! Is Globus Medical the…
  • Just Reflective, Not Disappointed: Globus Medical’s…
  • Globus Medical extends versatility of Advanced…
  • What Are the Strategic Reasons Behind Globus…
  • M6 Discontinued: What Are the Alternatives for a…
  • Dispute Over Spinal Implant Royalties Between…
  • Orthofix Discontinues M6-C™ and M6-L™ Artificial…
  • Eminent Spine’s 3D Printed Titanium Pedicle Screw…
  • (Updated!) 15 Expandable PLIF Cages to Know…!
  • Alphatec Today: Where It Stands and Where It’s Heading?
  • (UPDATED 2024): +108 Stand-Alone Cervical Cages to Know..!
  • Globus Medical Reports First Quarter 2025 Results
  • Has Globus Already Surpassed Medtronic in the Spine…
  • LAST 10 VIDEOS PUBLISHED

    1. POWEHI MEDICAL AG: TANTO® Screw
    2. Syntropiq: Taurus TLIF (Short)
    3. LEM Surgical: Dynamis Surgical Robot
    4. Aegis Spine:PathLoc-TA
    5. NGMedical: MOVE®-C Artificial Disc
    6. B.Braun Aesculap: Ennovate® Cervical MIS
    7. Spineart: PERLA® TL Deformity Solutions
    8. NGMedical: MOVE®-C
    9. Normmed Medical: ALIF Peek Cage
    10. PainTEQ: LinQ Sacroiliac

    Recent Comments

    • Sandy on Just Reflective, Not Disappointed: Globus Medical’s Bittersweet Q1 2025
    • SPINEMarketGroup on M6 Discontinued: What Are the Alternatives for a Cervical Artificial Disc?
    • Sergio López-Fombona on M6 Discontinued: What Are the Alternatives for a Cervical Artificial Disc?
    • Drew on Has Globus Already Surpassed Medtronic in the Spine Market? Can J&J Find Its Way Back to the Top?
    • Ahmed Hassan El-Naggary on Has Globus Already Surpassed Medtronic in the Spine Market? Can J&J Find Its Way Back to the Top?
    • Anonymous on Has Globus Already Surpassed Medtronic in the Spine Market? Can J&J Find Its Way Back to the Top?
    • Email
    • Twitter
    • YouTube

    Subscribe to Our Newsletter!

    Check your inbox or spam folder to confirm your subscription.

    Footer

    • Email
    • Twitter
    • YouTube

    Contact us:

    [email protected] [email protected]

    PRIVATE POLICY

    • Legal Advice
    • Embed Link
    • VIDEOS

    Copyright © 2025 · SPINEMarketGroup

    Manage Cookie Consent
    To provide the best experiences, we use technologies like cookies to store and/or access device information. Consenting to these technologies will allow us to process data such as browsing behavior or unique IDs on this site. Not consenting or withdrawing consent, may adversely affect certain features and functions.
    Functional Always active
    The technical storage or access is strictly necessary for the legitimate purpose of enabling the use of a specific service explicitly requested by the subscriber or user, or for the sole purpose of carrying out the transmission of a communication over an electronic communications network.
    Preferences
    The technical storage or access is necessary for the legitimate purpose of storing preferences that are not requested by the subscriber or user.
    Statistics
    The technical storage or access that is used exclusively for statistical purposes. The technical storage or access that is used exclusively for anonymous statistical purposes. Without a subpoena, voluntary compliance on the part of your Internet Service Provider, or additional records from a third party, information stored or retrieved for this purpose alone cannot usually be used to identify you.
    Marketing
    The technical storage or access is required to create user profiles to send advertising, or to track the user on a website or across several websites for similar marketing purposes.
    Manage options Manage services Manage {vendor_count} vendors Read more about these purposes
    View preferences
    {title} {title} {title}