• Skip to main content
  • Skip to secondary menu
  • Skip to primary sidebar
  • Skip to footer
  • MANUFACTURERS
  • HEADHUNTERS
  • PRODUCT SECTIONS
  • COMPANIES

SPINEMarketGroup

Spine Industry News

  • HOME
  • 2025
  • 2024
  • BROCHURES
  • ARTICLES
  • VIDEOS

Paradigm Spine, LLC Announces that Its Coflex® Can Be Covered In The States Of Alabama, Georgia And Tennessee

January 13, 2013 By SPINEMarketGroup

NEW YORK, Jan. 7, 2013 /PRNewswire/ — Paradigm Spine, LLC, a provider of innovative spinal implant technologies, announces the favorable Medicare determination by Cahaba Government Benefit Administrators, LLC® (Cahaba GBA) for the Company’s landmark coflex® interlaminar technology in the states of Alabama, Georgia and Tennessee. Coflex®, a post-decompression and motion preserving interlaminar stabilization device, has been available in the U.S. since receiving FDA PMA Approval in late 2012. Cahaba GBA administers Medicare health insurance for the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS), and has been a Medicare contractor since the inception of the program in 1966. Since its founding, Cahaba GBA has striven to develop and improve its business practices, and remains committed to offering the highest quality services to CMS and the Medicare providers it serves. On January 7, 2009, Cahaba GBA was awarded the Jurisdiction 10 A/B MAC contract from the Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services. As a result, today Cahaba GBA is primarily responsible for the administration of all Medicare Part A and Part B claims throughout the states of Alabama, Georgia and Tennessee. Cahaba GBA reached a favorable Medicare determination in the states of Alabama, Georgia and Tennessee for the use of Paradigm Spine, LLC’s coflex® interlaminar device as a non-fusion alternative for symptomatic spinal stenosis. This policy determination, which provides access to Medicare beneficiaries, was based on Cahaba GBA’s in-depth review of both submitted and available references and literature using standard “strength of evidence” guidelines. In view of the robust clinical data derived from the coflex® PMA Approval Study, combined with other key elements such as the coflex® Summary of Safety and Effectiveness Data (SSED) document and the coflex® Instructions For Use (IFU) document, Cahaba GBA has determined that “the use of the coflex® interlaminar device as a non-fusion alternative for symptomatic spinal stenosis can be covered as medically necessary.” While this is not a local coverage decision, and Cahaba GBA retains discretion to make individual claim determinations based on medical necessity, this favorable policy determination now provides the more than 3.3 million Medicare patients in Alabama, Georgia and Tennessee with a clinically-proven, motion-preserving, minimally invasive alternative to pedicle screw fusion for the treatment of moderate to severe spinal stenosis. Spinal stenosis is a condition usually worsened by exercise or walking, with symptoms that include pain, weakness, or numbness in the legs, calves or buttocks and is often associated with low back pain. It is estimated the treatment of lumbar spinal stenosis conditions costs the U.S. government Medicare system more than $2.3 billion annually[1]. According to findings derived from its U.S. PMA Clinical Study, on average, coflex® saved $5,000-$8,700 per case compared to the use of pedicle screw fusion[2]. These substantial costs savings were achieved through shorter operating room time, faster patient recovery, less narcotics usage and shorter hospital stay.
About Paradigm Spine, LLC
Paradigm Spine, LLC was founded in 2004 and remains focused on the design and development of solutions for the treatment of spinal diseases. The Company’s signature product is the coflex® interlaminar stabilization device, which has more than 18 years of clinical history and patients treated in more than 40 countries worldwide.

(Visited 2 times, 1 visits today)

Filed Under: NEWS Tagged With: 2013

Primary Sidebar

PLATINUM SPONSORS

GOLD SPONSORS

MOST POPULAR POSTS

  • BROCHURES
  • (UPDATED 2025): 6 Artificial Cervical Discs You’ll…
  • What’s Happening with Globus Medical? Why Has the…
  • Just Reflective, Not Disappointed: Globus Medical’s…
  • (UPDATED 2024): +8 Lumbar Artificial Discs to Know…
  • Stryker’s Spine Business Sale: A Smart Move or a…
  • Stryker’s Spine Exit: What It Means for…
  • Why Didn’t Globus Medical’s Stock Rise After…
  • Globus Medical extends versatility of Advanced…
  • M6 Discontinued: What Are the Alternatives for a…
  • Dispute Over Spinal Implant Royalties Between…
  • Eminent Spine’s 3D Printed Titanium Pedicle Screw…
  • Orthofix Discontinues M6-C™ and M6-L™ Artificial…
  • (Updated!) 15 Expandable PLIF Cages to Know…!
  • (UPDATED 2024): +108 Stand-Alone Cervical Cages to Know..!
  • Alphatec Today: Where It Stands and Where It’s Heading?
  • What Are the Strategic Reasons Behind Globus…
  • Globus Medical Reports First Quarter 2025 Results
  • Update:Stay Tuned Next Week! Is Globus Medical the…
  • Has Globus Already Surpassed Medtronic in the Spine…
  • LAST 10 VIDEOS PUBLISHED

    1. POWEHI MEDICAL AG: TANTO® Screw
    2. Syntropiq: Taurus TLIF (Short)
    3. LEM Surgical: Dynamis Surgical Robot
    4. Aegis Spine:PathLoc-TA
    5. NGMedical: MOVE®-C Artificial Disc
    6. B.Braun Aesculap: Ennovate® Cervical MIS
    7. Spineart: PERLA® TL Deformity Solutions
    8. NGMedical: MOVE®-C
    9. Normmed Medical: ALIF Peek Cage
    10. PainTEQ: LinQ Sacroiliac

    Recent Comments

    • Sandy on Just Reflective, Not Disappointed: Globus Medical’s Bittersweet Q1 2025
    • SPINEMarketGroup on M6 Discontinued: What Are the Alternatives for a Cervical Artificial Disc?
    • Sergio López-Fombona on M6 Discontinued: What Are the Alternatives for a Cervical Artificial Disc?
    • Drew on Has Globus Already Surpassed Medtronic in the Spine Market? Can J&J Find Its Way Back to the Top?
    • Ahmed Hassan El-Naggary on Has Globus Already Surpassed Medtronic in the Spine Market? Can J&J Find Its Way Back to the Top?
    • Anonymous on Has Globus Already Surpassed Medtronic in the Spine Market? Can J&J Find Its Way Back to the Top?
    • Email
    • Twitter
    • YouTube

    Subscribe to Our Newsletter!

    Check your inbox or spam folder to confirm your subscription.

    Footer

    • Email
    • Twitter
    • YouTube

    Contact us:

    [email protected] [email protected]

    PRIVATE POLICY

    • Legal Advice
    • Embed Link
    • VIDEOS

    Copyright © 2025 · SPINEMarketGroup

    Manage Cookie Consent
    To provide the best experiences, we use technologies like cookies to store and/or access device information. Consenting to these technologies will allow us to process data such as browsing behavior or unique IDs on this site. Not consenting or withdrawing consent, may adversely affect certain features and functions.
    Functional Always active
    The technical storage or access is strictly necessary for the legitimate purpose of enabling the use of a specific service explicitly requested by the subscriber or user, or for the sole purpose of carrying out the transmission of a communication over an electronic communications network.
    Preferences
    The technical storage or access is necessary for the legitimate purpose of storing preferences that are not requested by the subscriber or user.
    Statistics
    The technical storage or access that is used exclusively for statistical purposes. The technical storage or access that is used exclusively for anonymous statistical purposes. Without a subpoena, voluntary compliance on the part of your Internet Service Provider, or additional records from a third party, information stored or retrieved for this purpose alone cannot usually be used to identify you.
    Marketing
    The technical storage or access is required to create user profiles to send advertising, or to track the user on a website or across several websites for similar marketing purposes.
    Manage options Manage services Manage {vendor_count} vendors Read more about these purposes
    View preferences
    {title} {title} {title}