• Skip to main content
  • Skip to secondary menu
  • Skip to primary sidebar
  • Skip to footer
  • MANUFACTURERS
  • HEADHUNTERS
  • PRODUCT SECTIONS
  • COMPANIES

SPINEMarketGroup

Spine Industry News

  • HOME
  • 2025
  • 2024
  • BROCHURES
  • ARTICLES
  • VIDEOS

Paradigm Spine Announces U.S. FDA PMA Approval Of Its Landmark Coflex® Interlaminar Technology

October 17, 2012 By SPINEMarketGroup

NEW YORK, OCT. 17, 2012 — /PRNewswire/ — Paradigm Spine LLC, a provider of innovative spinal implant technologies, announces the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (“FDA”) has granted a Premarket Approval (“PMA”) Order for coflex®, a minimally invasive, Motion Preserving Interlaminar Stabilization™ device for the treatment of Moderate To Severe Stenosis With Or Without Back Pain™.
Key Points:

  • First PMA for the treatment of Moderate To Severe Stenosis With Or Without Back Pain™ 
  • First prospectively randomized comparative effectiveness Investigational Device Exemption (IDE) study that evaluated pedicle screw fusion following surgical decompression, the current standard of care for the treatment of moderate to severe spinal stenosis, as the control. This study is unique in spine because it prospectively collected Level 1 clinical, radiographic, safety and healthcare economic data. The coflex® device demonstrated better or equivalent outcomes in all major primary and secondary endpoints.
  • The coflex® patients spent 40% less time in the hospital compared to fusion (1.90 vs. 3.19 days), and coflex® surgeries were 36% faster compared to fusion (98 vs. 153 minutes)
  • At 2 years follow-up, 85.8% of coflex® patients showed clinically significant improvement in pain and function (measured by Oswestry Disability Index), compared to 76.7% of fusion patients
  • At 2 years follow-up, coflex® patients retained their pre-operative range of motion (within 10%) and translation (within 5%) at the treated level and maintained normal adjacent level motion. In contrast, fusion patients experience 62% motion reduction at the treated level, and 52% increase in range of motion at the superior adjacent level.
  • First PMA to collect healthcare economic data for spinal stenosis. The study data and resulting analyses demonstrate that coflex® saves the healthcare system an average of $5,000 to $8,700 per case when used as an alternative to pedicle screw fusion[1].
  • The coflex® study included a significant Medicare-aged patient population.
  • The coflex® device, now available in the United States, has more than 18 years of clinical history with regulatory approval in over 40 countries throughout 6 continents.

The coflex® clinical trial supporting the PMA represents the most comprehensive Level 1 comparative effectiveness study for the treatment of spinal stenosis. The rigorous six year clinical trial proves coflex® as the first and only motion-preserving alternative to fusion for the treatment of moderate to severe spinal stenosis, by demonstrating better or equivalent outcomes in all major primary and secondary clinical and radiologic assessments, while maintaining natural motion at both treated and adjacent spinal levels. The study results are based on data evaluated from 322 patients, at 21 sites throughout the United States, who presented with a history of spinal stenosis that failed over 6 months of conservative therapy. The patients enrolled in the study were prospectively randomized to receive a surgical decompression and either coflex® Interlaminar Stabilization™ or pedicle screw fusion. The coflex® device outperformed fusion in nearly all clinical, radiographic, and perioperative outcomes, supplemented with healthcare economic data measured through 589 data points evaluated for each individual study subject over a 2 year follow-up period. The data compiled for this study comprised more than 55,000 patient-completed case report form pages, more than 375,000 clinical and radiographic data points, more than 12,000 patient x-rays and prospective health insurance, reimbursement payment and claims data. The rigor of the clinical trial and the robustness of its results are supported by over a 95% follow-up through two years postoperatively, among the highest follow-up rate for any PMA approved device in spine.
According to a Wall Street Journal analysis of data compiled by the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services, it is estimated that fusion costs the United States government Medicare system more than $2.2 billion annually[2]. The coflex® study is the first and only to quantify actual cost savings based on prospective Level 1 data, compared to the current standard of care, posterolateral fusion. On average, coflex® saved $5,000 to $8,700 per case compared to fusion1. These substantial cost savings were achieved through significantly shorter operating room time, faster patient recovery, less blood loss, less narcotics usage by patients, and shorter hospital stay, while producing faster and more sustained clinically successful outcomes as compared to fusion in the treatment of spinal stenosis.
The PMA process is the most stringent FDA regulatory pathway for medical devices, where approval is based on a determination by the FDA that the PMA contains sufficient valid scientific evidence to ensure that the device is safe and effective for its intended use, and that the benefits of the procedure and device outweigh its risks. The FDA’s Summary of Safety and Effectiveness Data, states “Based on the clinical study results, it is reasonable to conclude that a significant portion of the indicated patient population will achieve clinically significant results. In conclusion, the coflex® device represents a reasonable alternative to posterolateral fusion for the treatment of spinal stenosis.”
Marc Viscogliosi, Chairman and CEO, stated “This study provides the evidence insurance companies, surgeons and patients have been demanding. Insurance companies, surgeons and patients finally have an alternative to fusion which, based on independent study data, has demonstrated that coflex® produces better outcomes, a faster recovery, preserves motion and may be performed on an outpatient basis. For patients, the ability to walk without back pain and the progressive symptoms of stenosis is one of the most cherished functions of the aging population.”
Hal Mathews, M.D., Executive Vice President and Chief Medical Officer, stated “The coflex® study results represent a celebration of evidence for surgeons, their patients and the insurance community. We now have objective evidence of the detrimental clinical effects and relatively expensive costs of pedicle screw fusion on spinal stenosis patients. Although outcomes for pedicle screw-based fusions have been historically acceptable, it was the only option surgeons had for the last 25 years to provide stabilization when indicated, along with the decompression procedure. Importantly, coflex® was able to deliver better outcomes at a significantly lower cost to the healthcare system, which we believe is an important mandate of the current healthcare reform law.”
Reginald Davis, M.D.[3], Principal Investigator for the coflex® study, stated “This is the first time a new spinal technology is proven to be better and more effective than the historical gold standard, and is still actually lower cost. I am excited to be able to provide coflex® to my patients without the need for fusion through a simple, motion preserving, and minimally invasive bone-saving surgical technique.”


Read more here: http://www.heraldonline.com/2012/10/17/4344308/paradigm-spine-announces-us-fda.html#storylink=cpy
(Visited 11 times, 2 visits today)

Filed Under: 2012, NEWS, OLD ARCHIVES Tagged With: 2012

Primary Sidebar

PLATINUM SPONSORS

GOLD SPONSORS

MOST POPULAR POSTS

  • BROCHURES
  • (UPDATED 2025): 6 Artificial Cervical Discs You’ll…
  • What’s Happening with Globus Medical? Why Has the…
  • Just Reflective, Not Disappointed: Globus Medical’s…
  • (UPDATED 2024): +8 Lumbar Artificial Discs to Know…
  • Stryker’s Spine Business Sale: A Smart Move or a…
  • Stryker’s Spine Exit: What It Means for…
  • Why Didn’t Globus Medical’s Stock Rise After…
  • Globus Medical extends versatility of Advanced…
  • M6 Discontinued: What Are the Alternatives for a…
  • Dispute Over Spinal Implant Royalties Between…
  • Eminent Spine’s 3D Printed Titanium Pedicle Screw…
  • Orthofix Discontinues M6-C™ and M6-L™ Artificial…
  • Alphatec Today: Where It Stands and Where It’s Heading?
  • (Updated!) 15 Expandable PLIF Cages to Know…!
  • (UPDATED 2024): +108 Stand-Alone Cervical Cages to Know..!
  • What Are the Strategic Reasons Behind Globus…
  • Globus Medical Reports First Quarter 2025 Results
  • Update:Stay Tuned Next Week! Is Globus Medical the…
  • Has Globus Already Surpassed Medtronic in the Spine…
  • LAST 10 VIDEOS PUBLISHED

    1. POWEHI MEDICAL AG: TANTO® Screw
    2. Syntropiq: Taurus TLIF (Short)
    3. LEM Surgical: Dynamis Surgical Robot
    4. Aegis Spine:PathLoc-TA
    5. NGMedical: MOVE®-C Artificial Disc
    6. B.Braun Aesculap: Ennovate® Cervical MIS
    7. Spineart: PERLA® TL Deformity Solutions
    8. NGMedical: MOVE®-C
    9. Normmed Medical: ALIF Peek Cage
    10. PainTEQ: LinQ Sacroiliac

    Recent Comments

    • Sandy on Just Reflective, Not Disappointed: Globus Medical’s Bittersweet Q1 2025
    • SPINEMarketGroup on M6 Discontinued: What Are the Alternatives for a Cervical Artificial Disc?
    • Sergio López-Fombona on M6 Discontinued: What Are the Alternatives for a Cervical Artificial Disc?
    • Drew on Has Globus Already Surpassed Medtronic in the Spine Market? Can J&J Find Its Way Back to the Top?
    • Ahmed Hassan El-Naggary on Has Globus Already Surpassed Medtronic in the Spine Market? Can J&J Find Its Way Back to the Top?
    • Anonymous on Has Globus Already Surpassed Medtronic in the Spine Market? Can J&J Find Its Way Back to the Top?
    • Email
    • Twitter
    • YouTube

    Subscribe to Our Newsletter!

    Check your inbox or spam folder to confirm your subscription.

    Footer

    • Email
    • Twitter
    • YouTube

    Contact us:

    [email protected] [email protected]

    PRIVATE POLICY

    • Legal Advice
    • Embed Link
    • VIDEOS

    Copyright © 2025 · SPINEMarketGroup

    Manage Cookie Consent
    To provide the best experiences, we use technologies like cookies to store and/or access device information. Consenting to these technologies will allow us to process data such as browsing behavior or unique IDs on this site. Not consenting or withdrawing consent, may adversely affect certain features and functions.
    Functional Always active
    The technical storage or access is strictly necessary for the legitimate purpose of enabling the use of a specific service explicitly requested by the subscriber or user, or for the sole purpose of carrying out the transmission of a communication over an electronic communications network.
    Preferences
    The technical storage or access is necessary for the legitimate purpose of storing preferences that are not requested by the subscriber or user.
    Statistics
    The technical storage or access that is used exclusively for statistical purposes. The technical storage or access that is used exclusively for anonymous statistical purposes. Without a subpoena, voluntary compliance on the part of your Internet Service Provider, or additional records from a third party, information stored or retrieved for this purpose alone cannot usually be used to identify you.
    Marketing
    The technical storage or access is required to create user profiles to send advertising, or to track the user on a website or across several websites for similar marketing purposes.
    Manage options Manage services Manage {vendor_count} vendors Read more about these purposes
    View preferences
    {title} {title} {title}