• Skip to main content
  • Skip to secondary menu
  • Skip to primary sidebar
  • Skip to footer
  • MANUFACTURERS
  • HEADHUNTERS
  • PRODUCT SECTIONS
  • COMPANIES

SPINEMarketGroup

Spine Industry News

  • HOME
  • 2025
  • 2024
  • BROCHURES
  • ARTICLES
  • VIDEOS

Medtronic Seeks Royalties, Interest From NuVasive Over Patents

February 12, 2012 By SPINEMarketGroup

Feb. 11 (Bloomberg) — Medtronic Inc. asked a federal judge to order NuVasive Inc. to pay royalties on sales of spinal surgery products that infringed its patents, as well as $19.8 million in interest on a jury verdict last year.The request, filed yesterday in federal court in San Diego, follows a $101 million verdict won by Medtronic. The Sept. 20 verdict was the 18th-largest jury award in the U.S. in 2011 and the fourth-largest in a patent-infringement claim, according to data compiled by Bloomberg.“Anything less would reward NuVasive’s ongoing infringement and would encourage NuVasive to continue to infringe rather than to develop its own technology,” Medtronic’s lawyers said in the filing. NuVasive, in its own filing, argued that it shouldn’t have to pay any more, and that if the court does award pre-judgment interest and royalties, the amounts should be lower than Medtronic seeks.The trial was over claims by Minneapolis-based Medtronic’s Warsaw Orthopedic unit that San Diego-based NuVasive infringed three patents for implants capable of being inserted trans- laterally between adjacent vertebrae, a plate and screw system used to stabilize vertebrae in the cervical spine and a tissue retractor, according to court filings.After the verdict, NuVasive failed to convince U.S. District Judge Michael M. Anello that the patents weren’t infringed and that the jury verdict wasn’t supported by the evidence.
No Permanent Injunction
In his Jan. 26 ruling, the judge rejected NuVasive’s claim that one of the patents in dispute was invalid. He also denied Medtronic’s request for a permanent injunction barring NuVasive from selling the devices found to infringe its patents.Anello additionally left intact the jury’s award of $660,000 in damages to NuVasive for Medtronic’s infringement of one of its patents.Medtronic asked in today’s filing for the judge to impose royalties of at least 36 percent for one infringed patent, 11 percent for a second patent and 7 percent for the third.NuVasive said the royalties should be no more than 10 percent for the first patent, 3 percent for the second and 2 percent for the third. Pre-judgment interest for Medtronic should be capped at $1.3 million, and Medtronic should pay $3,551 in interest for the patent it infringed, NuVasive said in its filing.The case is Medtronic Sofamor Danek USA v. NuVasive Inc., 3:08-cv-1512, U.S. District Court, Southern District of California (San Diego).
Source:Bill Callahan Editors: Peter Blumberg, Michael Hytha

(Visited 24 times, 7 visits today)

Filed Under: 2012, OLD ARCHIVES Tagged With: 2012

Primary Sidebar

PLATINUM SPONSORS

GOLD SPONSORS

MOST POPULAR POSTS

  • BROCHURES
  • (UPDATED 2025): 6 Artificial Cervical Discs You’ll…
  • Stryker’s Spine Exit: What It Means for…
  • What’s Happening with Globus Medical? Why Has the…
  • Just Reflective, Not Disappointed: Globus Medical’s…
  • (UPDATED 2024): +8 Lumbar Artificial Discs to Know…
  • Stryker’s Spine Business Sale: A Smart Move or a…
  • Why Didn’t Globus Medical’s Stock Rise After…
  • Update:Stay Tuned Next Week! Is Globus Medical the…
  • Globus Medical extends versatility of Advanced…
  • M6 Discontinued: What Are the Alternatives for a…
  • Dispute Over Spinal Implant Royalties Between…
  • Eminent Spine’s 3D Printed Titanium Pedicle Screw…
  • Orthofix Discontinues M6-C™ and M6-L™ Artificial…
  • What Are the Strategic Reasons Behind Globus…
  • (Updated!) 15 Expandable PLIF Cages to Know…!
  • (UPDATED 2024): +108 Stand-Alone Cervical Cages to Know..!
  • Alphatec Today: Where It Stands and Where It’s Heading?
  • Globus Medical Reports First Quarter 2025 Results
  • Has Globus Already Surpassed Medtronic in the Spine…
  • LAST 10 VIDEOS PUBLISHED

    1. POWEHI MEDICAL AG: TANTO® Screw
    2. Syntropiq: Taurus TLIF (Short)
    3. LEM Surgical: Dynamis Surgical Robot
    4. Aegis Spine:PathLoc-TA
    5. NGMedical: MOVE®-C Artificial Disc
    6. B.Braun Aesculap: Ennovate® Cervical MIS
    7. Spineart: PERLA® TL Deformity Solutions
    8. NGMedical: MOVE®-C
    9. Normmed Medical: ALIF Peek Cage
    10. PainTEQ: LinQ Sacroiliac

    Recent Comments

    • Sandy on Just Reflective, Not Disappointed: Globus Medical’s Bittersweet Q1 2025
    • SPINEMarketGroup on M6 Discontinued: What Are the Alternatives for a Cervical Artificial Disc?
    • Sergio López-Fombona on M6 Discontinued: What Are the Alternatives for a Cervical Artificial Disc?
    • Drew on Has Globus Already Surpassed Medtronic in the Spine Market? Can J&J Find Its Way Back to the Top?
    • Ahmed Hassan El-Naggary on Has Globus Already Surpassed Medtronic in the Spine Market? Can J&J Find Its Way Back to the Top?
    • Anonymous on Has Globus Already Surpassed Medtronic in the Spine Market? Can J&J Find Its Way Back to the Top?
    • Email
    • Twitter
    • YouTube

    Subscribe to Our Newsletter!

    Check your inbox or spam folder to confirm your subscription.

    Footer

    • Email
    • Twitter
    • YouTube

    Contact us:

    [email protected] [email protected]

    PRIVATE POLICY

    • Legal Advice
    • Embed Link
    • VIDEOS

    Copyright © 2025 · SPINEMarketGroup

    Manage Cookie Consent
    To provide the best experiences, we use technologies like cookies to store and/or access device information. Consenting to these technologies will allow us to process data such as browsing behavior or unique IDs on this site. Not consenting or withdrawing consent, may adversely affect certain features and functions.
    Functional Always active
    The technical storage or access is strictly necessary for the legitimate purpose of enabling the use of a specific service explicitly requested by the subscriber or user, or for the sole purpose of carrying out the transmission of a communication over an electronic communications network.
    Preferences
    The technical storage or access is necessary for the legitimate purpose of storing preferences that are not requested by the subscriber or user.
    Statistics
    The technical storage or access that is used exclusively for statistical purposes. The technical storage or access that is used exclusively for anonymous statistical purposes. Without a subpoena, voluntary compliance on the part of your Internet Service Provider, or additional records from a third party, information stored or retrieved for this purpose alone cannot usually be used to identify you.
    Marketing
    The technical storage or access is required to create user profiles to send advertising, or to track the user on a website or across several websites for similar marketing purposes.
    Manage options Manage services Manage {vendor_count} vendors Read more about these purposes
    View preferences
    {title} {title} {title}