• Skip to main content
  • Skip to secondary menu
  • Skip to primary sidebar
  • Skip to footer
  • MANUFACTURERS
  • HEADHUNTERS
  • PRODUCT SECTIONS
  • COMPANIES

SPINEMarketGroup

Spine Industry News

  • HOME
  • 2025
  • 2024
  • BROCHURES
  • ARTICLES
  • VIDEOS

Lanx loses bid to toss NuVasive’s poaching lawsuit

July 24, 2012 By SPINEMarketGroup

Medical device company Lanx Inc. lost a bid to have 1 of at least 2 breach-of-contract lawsuits filed against it by competitor NuVasive (NSDQ:NUVA) thrown out.
The Delaware Chancery Court denied a Lanx motion to dismiss the suit accusing it of raiding NuVasive’s sales force and poaching a surgeon consultant. A separate lawsuit filed in the U.S. District Court for Southern Texas makes similar allegations against Lanx and several named defendants, but the Delaware case names only Lanx.
That was the basis for the dismissal motion (Delaware’s chancery court rules allow defendants to move for dismissal for failure to “join an indispensable party”). But vice chancellor Sam Glasscock III denied the motion, ruling that the sales reps and surgeon in question aren’t indispensable to the case.
“The plaintiff seeks injunctive relief, as well as damages. Because that injunctive relief may affect interests of the plaintiff’s former employees, they are necessary parties to this litigation. Because in equity I may take the plaintiff’s former employees’ interests into account when considering whether to grant injunctive relief as well as the scope of any such relief, I find that the plaintiff’s former employees are not indispensable to this litigation, and the Defendant’s motion to dismiss or stay is, accordingly, denied,” Glasscock wrote.
In the Texas lawsuit, filed in March, NuVasive sued 2 former sales executives, James Greene and William Vanlandingham, who jumped ship for Lanx, accusing them of violating non-compete agreements.
“On or around October, 2011, Lanx began a raid on NuVasive employees across
the country,” according to the lawsuit. “This raid started in western New York, where 5 NuVasive salespeople left NuVasive to work for Lanx, and a top consulting surgeon for NuVasive announced that he had become a consultant for Lanx. Two months later, 3 top California directors and managers were recruited from NuVasive to work for Lanx. After learning of Lanx’s raid on its California employees, NuVasive sent Lanx a cease and desist letter. Lanx responded dismissively, and continued to raid NuVasive employees.”
“[I]n late 2011 and early 2012, Lanx targeted NuVasive’s Texas workforce, and started recruiting Mr. Greene, Mr. Vanlandingham, and others, to join the company,” according to the lawsuit, which seeks legal fees, injunctions barring further contract breaches, damages, punitive damages, and pre- and post-judgment interest.
Source:Massdevice.com

(Visited 5 times, 2 visits today)

Filed Under: 2012, OLD ARCHIVES Tagged With: 2012

Primary Sidebar

PLATINUM SPONSORS

GOLD SPONSORS

MOST POPULAR POSTS

  • BROCHURES
  • Stryker’s Spine Exit: What It Means for…
  • (UPDATED 2025): 6 Artificial Cervical Discs You’ll…
  • Stryker’s Spine Business Sale: A Smart Move or a…
  • (UPDATED 2024): +8 Lumbar Artificial Discs to Know…
  • What’s Happening with Globus Medical? Why Has the…
  • Why Didn’t Globus Medical’s Stock Rise After…
  • Update:Stay Tuned Next Week! Is Globus Medical the…
  • What Are the Strategic Reasons Behind Globus…
  • Globus Medical extends versatility of Advanced…
  • M6 Discontinued: What Are the Alternatives for a…
  • Dispute Over Spinal Implant Royalties Between…
  • Orthofix Discontinues M6-C™ and M6-L™ Artificial…
  • (Updated!) 15 Expandable PLIF Cages to Know…!
  • Eminent Spine’s 3D Printed Titanium Pedicle Screw…
  • Alphatec Today: Where It Stands and Where It’s Heading?
  • (UPDATED 2024): +108 Stand-Alone Cervical Cages to Know..!
  • Just Reflective, Not Disappointed: Globus Medical’s…
  • Globus Medical Reports First Quarter 2025 Results
  • Has Globus Already Surpassed Medtronic in the Spine…
  • LAST 10 VIDEOS PUBLISHED

    1. POWEHI MEDICAL AG: TANTO® Screw
    2. Syntropiq: Taurus TLIF (Short)
    3. LEM Surgical: Dynamis Surgical Robot
    4. Aegis Spine:PathLoc-TA
    5. NGMedical: MOVE®-C Artificial Disc
    6. B.Braun Aesculap: Ennovate® Cervical MIS
    7. Spineart: PERLA® TL Deformity Solutions
    8. NGMedical: MOVE®-C
    9. Normmed Medical: ALIF Peek Cage
    10. PainTEQ: LinQ Sacroiliac

    Recent Comments

    • SPINEMarketGroup on M6 Discontinued: What Are the Alternatives for a Cervical Artificial Disc?
    • Sergio López-Fombona on M6 Discontinued: What Are the Alternatives for a Cervical Artificial Disc?
    • Drew on Has Globus Already Surpassed Medtronic in the Spine Market? Can J&J Find Its Way Back to the Top?
    • Ahmed Hassan El-Naggary on Has Globus Already Surpassed Medtronic in the Spine Market? Can J&J Find Its Way Back to the Top?
    • Anonymous on Has Globus Already Surpassed Medtronic in the Spine Market? Can J&J Find Its Way Back to the Top?
    • Mid-career Xennnial on Is Being a Doctor a Job, or a Calling? The Generational Divide Reshaping Medicine
    • Email
    • Twitter
    • YouTube

    Subscribe to Our Newsletter!

    Check your inbox or spam folder to confirm your subscription.

    Footer

    • Email
    • Twitter
    • YouTube

    Contact us:

    [email protected] [email protected]

    PRIVATE POLICY

    • Legal Advice
    • Embed Link
    • VIDEOS

    Copyright © 2025 · SPINEMarketGroup

    Manage Cookie Consent
    To provide the best experiences, we use technologies like cookies to store and/or access device information. Consenting to these technologies will allow us to process data such as browsing behavior or unique IDs on this site. Not consenting or withdrawing consent, may adversely affect certain features and functions.
    Functional Always active
    The technical storage or access is strictly necessary for the legitimate purpose of enabling the use of a specific service explicitly requested by the subscriber or user, or for the sole purpose of carrying out the transmission of a communication over an electronic communications network.
    Preferences
    The technical storage or access is necessary for the legitimate purpose of storing preferences that are not requested by the subscriber or user.
    Statistics
    The technical storage or access that is used exclusively for statistical purposes. The technical storage or access that is used exclusively for anonymous statistical purposes. Without a subpoena, voluntary compliance on the part of your Internet Service Provider, or additional records from a third party, information stored or retrieved for this purpose alone cannot usually be used to identify you.
    Marketing
    The technical storage or access is required to create user profiles to send advertising, or to track the user on a website or across several websites for similar marketing purposes.
    Manage options Manage services Manage {vendor_count} vendors Read more about these purposes
    View preferences
    {title} {title} {title}