• Skip to main content
  • Skip to secondary menu
  • Skip to primary sidebar
  • Skip to footer
  • MANUFACTURERS
  • HEADHUNTERS
  • PRODUCT SECTIONS
  • COMPANIES

SPINEMarketGroup

Spine Industry News

  • HOME
  • 2025
  • 2024
  • BROCHURES
  • ARTICLES
  • VIDEOS

J&J Faces Second Trial Over Recalled Hip After Loss

March 11, 2013 By SPINEMarketGroup

Johnson & Johnson (JNJ)’s DePuy unit, which just lost a $8.3 million verdict in the first trial over its recalled metal hip implant, now faces a second jury that will consider whether the design was defective.Jurors in Chicago will hear opening statements today about a lawsuit by Carol Strum, 54, an Illinois nurse who claims DePuy’s ASR hip was defective and the company failed to warn of risks. The case is the second of 10,750 lawsuits against J&J, the world’s largest seller of health-care products, to go to trial.On March 8, a state court jury in Los Angeles concluded the ASR XL design was defective and caused injury to Loren “Bill” Kransky, a retired prison guard from Montana. Jurors awarded him $8.3 million in compensatory damages. The panel found DePuy properly warned of the risks and didn’t owe punitive damages to punish the company.
“We think this is an egregious situation of DePuy’s failure to take any action about a clear problem with the performance of its hip replacement system,” Strum attorney Peter J. Flowers said in an interview. “It’s the classic case of profits over safety.”DePuy, a unit of New Brunswick, New Jersey-based J&J, denies it defectively designed the ASR or that it failed to warn of the risks. J&J recalled 93,000 of the implants in August 2010, when it said 12 percent failed within five years. Last year, 44 percent failed in Australia within seven years. Analysts say the lawsuits could cost J&J billions of dollars to resolve.
‘Known Risks’
“The company believes the evidence will show ASR XL was properly designed,” DePuy spokeswoman Lorie Gawreluk said in an e-mail. “The plaintiff’s physician was properly informed of the product’s known risks, and DePuy’s actions concerning the product were appropriate and responsible.”Jurors in Los Angeles didn’t hear evidence about the U.S. Food and Drug Administration’s review and clearance of the ASR device, or the company’s recall. A similar model was first sold in Europe in 2003, and sales in the U.S. began in 2005. Jurors in the Chicago case will hear about the FDA review and recall.
“The product was thoroughly and appropriately reviewed by the FDA,” Gawreluk said.
Surgeons implanted a metal cup, made of a chromium and cobalt alloy, in the hip and a metal ball atop the femur that rotated inside the cup. Experts for Kransky in the Los Angeles trial said the defective design caused metal ions to shed into surrounding tissue.Strum had her ASR implanted on Jan. 29, 2008. She later developed high levels of chromium and cobalt and had her hip replaced through a revision surgery on Jan. 6, 2011, according to her complaint.Strum also is seeking punitive damages in the case. Jurors in the Kransky trial rejected a request for such damages, indicating “fraud or malice,” of as much as $179 million.
The case is Strum v. DePuy, 2011-L-9352, Circuit Court of Cook County (Chicago).
Source:David Voreacos,Michael Hytha.bloomberg.net

(Visited 14 times, 3 visits today)

Filed Under: Legal, NEWS Tagged With: 2013

Primary Sidebar

PLATINUM SPONSORS

GOLD SPONSORS

MOST POPULAR POSTS

  • BROCHURES
  • (UPDATED 2025): 6 Artificial Cervical Discs You’ll…
  • What’s Happening with Globus Medical? Why Has the…
  • Just Reflective, Not Disappointed: Globus Medical’s…
  • (UPDATED 2024): +8 Lumbar Artificial Discs to Know…
  • Stryker’s Spine Business Sale: A Smart Move or a…
  • Stryker’s Spine Exit: What It Means for…
  • Why Didn’t Globus Medical’s Stock Rise After…
  • Globus Medical extends versatility of Advanced…
  • M6 Discontinued: What Are the Alternatives for a…
  • Dispute Over Spinal Implant Royalties Between…
  • Eminent Spine’s 3D Printed Titanium Pedicle Screw…
  • Orthofix Discontinues M6-C™ and M6-L™ Artificial…
  • (Updated!) 15 Expandable PLIF Cages to Know…!
  • (UPDATED 2024): +108 Stand-Alone Cervical Cages to Know..!
  • Alphatec Today: Where It Stands and Where It’s Heading?
  • What Are the Strategic Reasons Behind Globus…
  • Globus Medical Reports First Quarter 2025 Results
  • Update:Stay Tuned Next Week! Is Globus Medical the…
  • Has Globus Already Surpassed Medtronic in the Spine…
  • LAST 10 VIDEOS PUBLISHED

    1. POWEHI MEDICAL AG: TANTO® Screw
    2. Syntropiq: Taurus TLIF (Short)
    3. LEM Surgical: Dynamis Surgical Robot
    4. Aegis Spine:PathLoc-TA
    5. NGMedical: MOVE®-C Artificial Disc
    6. B.Braun Aesculap: Ennovate® Cervical MIS
    7. Spineart: PERLA® TL Deformity Solutions
    8. NGMedical: MOVE®-C
    9. Normmed Medical: ALIF Peek Cage
    10. PainTEQ: LinQ Sacroiliac

    Recent Comments

    • Sandy on Just Reflective, Not Disappointed: Globus Medical’s Bittersweet Q1 2025
    • SPINEMarketGroup on M6 Discontinued: What Are the Alternatives for a Cervical Artificial Disc?
    • Sergio López-Fombona on M6 Discontinued: What Are the Alternatives for a Cervical Artificial Disc?
    • Drew on Has Globus Already Surpassed Medtronic in the Spine Market? Can J&J Find Its Way Back to the Top?
    • Ahmed Hassan El-Naggary on Has Globus Already Surpassed Medtronic in the Spine Market? Can J&J Find Its Way Back to the Top?
    • Anonymous on Has Globus Already Surpassed Medtronic in the Spine Market? Can J&J Find Its Way Back to the Top?
    • Email
    • Twitter
    • YouTube

    Subscribe to Our Newsletter!

    Check your inbox or spam folder to confirm your subscription.

    Footer

    • Email
    • Twitter
    • YouTube

    Contact us:

    [email protected] [email protected]

    PRIVATE POLICY

    • Legal Advice
    • Embed Link
    • VIDEOS

    Copyright © 2025 · SPINEMarketGroup

    Manage Cookie Consent
    To provide the best experiences, we use technologies like cookies to store and/or access device information. Consenting to these technologies will allow us to process data such as browsing behavior or unique IDs on this site. Not consenting or withdrawing consent, may adversely affect certain features and functions.
    Functional Always active
    The technical storage or access is strictly necessary for the legitimate purpose of enabling the use of a specific service explicitly requested by the subscriber or user, or for the sole purpose of carrying out the transmission of a communication over an electronic communications network.
    Preferences
    The technical storage or access is necessary for the legitimate purpose of storing preferences that are not requested by the subscriber or user.
    Statistics
    The technical storage or access that is used exclusively for statistical purposes. The technical storage or access that is used exclusively for anonymous statistical purposes. Without a subpoena, voluntary compliance on the part of your Internet Service Provider, or additional records from a third party, information stored or retrieved for this purpose alone cannot usually be used to identify you.
    Marketing
    The technical storage or access is required to create user profiles to send advertising, or to track the user on a website or across several websites for similar marketing purposes.
    Manage options Manage services Manage {vendor_count} vendors Read more about these purposes
    View preferences
    {title} {title} {title}