• Skip to main content
  • Skip to secondary menu
  • Skip to primary sidebar
  • Skip to footer
  • MANUFACTURERS
  • HEADHUNTERS
  • PRODUCT SECTIONS
  • COMPANIES

SPINEMarketGroup

Spine Industry News

  • HOME
  • 2025
  • 2024
  • BROCHURES
  • ARTICLES
  • VIDEOS

History of LLIF

September 27, 2014 By SPINEMarketGroup

Minimally invasive spine surgery has evolved from traditional open spine surgery, and it is an accepted, safe alternative (McAfee, et al., 2010). Traditional open operations for lumbar interbody fusion include anterior lumbar interbody fusion (ALIF), posterior lumbar interbody fusion (PLIF), and transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion (TLIF).

The ALIF provides for a large interbody graft for disc space re-expansion, restoration of lumbar lordosis, and elimination of discogenic pain (Hodgson & Stock, 1956). In addition, posterior facet joint complexes and tension bands remain intact. However, an access surgeon may be needed, and complications can include a risk of vascular injury and also rare iatrogenic retrograde ejaculation in males postoperatively.

The TLIF (Harms & Rolinger, 1982; Harms & Jeszenszky, 1998) was developed as a modification of the PLIF (Cloward, 1953) to decrease the degree of nerve root and thecal sac manipulation, and it allows for interbody fusion, concurrent posterior segmental instrumentation, and circumferential fusion. It can be performed either in an open or minimally invasive manner. The graft size is typically smaller than that of the ALIF, however.

LATERAL

First introduced by Luiz Pimenta in 2001, the retroperitoneal transpsoas minimally invasive
lateral interbody fusion (MIS LIF) or Lateral Lumbar Interbody Fusion (LLIF) is a safe and effective alternative to anterior or posterior approaches for lumbar fusion (Pimenta, 2001; Ozgur, et al., 2006). Advantages include indirectneurological decompression with less tissue trauma, minimal blood loss, shorter operation times, less wound issues, placement of a larger cage, and early patient mobilization (Eck, et al.,2007; Benglis, et al., 2008; Wang, et al., 2008; Uribe, et al., 2010). In addition, normal stabilizing ligaments are not sacrificed as compared to other interbody techniques.

This technique was an adaptation of an endoscopic lateral transpsoas approach to lumbar fusion as described by Bergey et al. (Bergey, et al., 2004). They found that the endoscopic lateral transpsoas approach to the lumbar spine was a safe method to fuse the lumbar vertebrae, which allowed for exposure of the lumbar spine without mobilization of the great vessels or sympathetic plexus.

Today, there are several systems from various manufacturers that will allow for an MIS
lateral retroperitoneal transpsoas approach. The two most common are the eXtreme Lateral
Interbody Fusion/XLIF® (NuVasive, San Diego, CA) and Direct Lateral Interbody
Fusion/DLIF® (Medtronic, Memphis, TN).Clinical applications of the retroperitoneal transpsoas MIS LIF include a wide range of spinal conditions including trauma, adult degenerative scoliosis, degenerative disc disease,spondylosis with instability, lumbar stenosis, spondylolisthesis, tumor, and adjacentsegment failure. Research on MIS LIF is very active, and clinical outcomes appear to be
promising.

Source:Tien V. Le and Juan S. Uribe (2012). The Minimally Invasive Retroperitoneal Transpsoas Approach, Spine Surgery, Dr. Kook Jin Chung (Ed.), ISBN: 978-953-51-0469-8

(Visited 108 times, 17 visits today)

Filed Under: NEWS

Primary Sidebar

PLATINUM SPONSORS

GOLD SPONSORS

MOST POPULAR POSTS

  • BROCHURES
  • Just Reflective, Not Disappointed: Globus Medical’s…
  • (UPDATED 2025): 6 Artificial Cervical Discs You’ll…
  • What’s Happening with Globus Medical? Why Has the…
  • (UPDATED 2024): +8 Lumbar Artificial Discs to Know…
  • Stryker’s Spine Business Sale: A Smart Move or a…
  • Why Didn’t Globus Medical’s Stock Rise After…
  • Globus Medical extends versatility of Advanced…
  • Globus Medical to Execute $500 Million Share Buyback…
  • Dispute Over Spinal Implant Royalties Between…
  • M6 Discontinued: What Are the Alternatives for a…
  • Eminent Spine’s 3D Printed Titanium Pedicle Screw…
  • Orthofix Discontinues M6-C™ and M6-L™ Artificial…
  • Stryker’s Spine Exit: What It Means for…
  • Alphatec Today: Where It Stands and Where It’s Heading?
  • (Updated!) 15 Expandable PLIF Cages to Know…!
  • (UPDATED 2024): +108 Stand-Alone Cervical Cages to Know..!
  • Globus Medical Reports First Quarter 2025 Results
  • What Are the Strategic Reasons Behind Globus…
  • Viscogliosi Brothers Completes Acquisition of U.S.…
  • LAST 10 VIDEOS PUBLISHED

    1. Biedermann Motech: MOSS 100 (Short)
    2. POWEHI MEDICAL AG: KUDOS™ Modular
    3. POWEHI MEDICAL AG: TANTO® Screw
    4. Syntropiq: Taurus TLIF (Short)
    5. LEM Surgical: Dynamis Surgical Robot
    6. Aegis Spine:PathLoc-TA
    7. NGMedical: MOVE®-C Artificial Disc
    8. B.Braun Aesculap: Ennovate® Cervical MIS
    9. Spineart: PERLA® TL Deformity Solutions
    10. NGMedical: MOVE®-C

    Recent Comments

    • Peter on A New Player in Spinal Care, POWEHI Medical!
    • Sandy on Just Reflective, Not Disappointed: Globus Medical’s Bittersweet Q1 2025
    • SPINEMarketGroup on M6 Discontinued: What Are the Alternatives for a Cervical Artificial Disc?
    • Sergio López-Fombona on M6 Discontinued: What Are the Alternatives for a Cervical Artificial Disc?
    • Drew on Has Globus Already Surpassed Medtronic in the Spine Market? Can J&J Find Its Way Back to the Top?
    • Ahmed Hassan El-Naggary on Has Globus Already Surpassed Medtronic in the Spine Market? Can J&J Find Its Way Back to the Top?
    • Email
    • Twitter
    • YouTube

    Subscribe to Our Newsletter!

    Check your inbox or spam folder to confirm your subscription.

    Footer

    • Email
    • Twitter
    • YouTube

    Contact us:

    [email protected] [email protected]

    PRIVATE POLICY

    • Legal Advice
    • Embed Link
    • VIDEOS

    Copyright © 2025 · SPINEMarketGroup

    Manage Cookie Consent
    To provide the best experiences, we use technologies like cookies to store and/or access device information. Consenting to these technologies will allow us to process data such as browsing behavior or unique IDs on this site. Not consenting or withdrawing consent, may adversely affect certain features and functions.
    Functional Always active
    The technical storage or access is strictly necessary for the legitimate purpose of enabling the use of a specific service explicitly requested by the subscriber or user, or for the sole purpose of carrying out the transmission of a communication over an electronic communications network.
    Preferences
    The technical storage or access is necessary for the legitimate purpose of storing preferences that are not requested by the subscriber or user.
    Statistics
    The technical storage or access that is used exclusively for statistical purposes. The technical storage or access that is used exclusively for anonymous statistical purposes. Without a subpoena, voluntary compliance on the part of your Internet Service Provider, or additional records from a third party, information stored or retrieved for this purpose alone cannot usually be used to identify you.
    Marketing
    The technical storage or access is required to create user profiles to send advertising, or to track the user on a website or across several websites for similar marketing purposes.
    Manage options Manage services Manage {vendor_count} vendors Read more about these purposes
    View preferences
    {title} {title} {title}