• Skip to main content
  • Skip to secondary menu
  • Skip to primary sidebar
  • Skip to footer
  • MANUFACTURERS
  • HEADHUNTERS
  • PRODUCT SECTIONS
  • COMPANIES

SPINEMarketGroup

Spine Industry News

  • HOME
  • 2025
  • 2024
  • BROCHURES
  • ARTICLES
  • VIDEOS

Cerapedics Receives FDA Approval for i-FACTOR™ Peptide Enhanced Bone Graft in Cervical Spine Surgery

November 4, 2015 By The SPINE market group

WESTMINSTER, Colo., Nov. 3, 2015 /PRNewswire/ — Cerapedics, a privately-held orthobiologics company, announced today the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA) has approved the company’s Premarket Approval (PMA) application for i-FACTOR™ Peptide Enhanced Bone Graft
for use in anterior cervical discectomy and fusion (ACDF) procedures in patients with degenerative cervical disc disease. i-FACTOR bone graft is the first bone graft to be approved for use in the cervical spine and only the second PMA-approved bone graft in the spine.

“This is an historic milestone for us at Cerapedics and also for the surgical treatment of cervical disc degeneration,” said Jeffrey G. Marx, Ph.D., president and COO of Cerapedics. “It is the culmination of years of seamless cooperation with our clinical investigators to support PMA approval. With our transition to a commercial stage company, all of us at Cerapedics look forward to bringing an important new biologic bone graft option, the only backed by significant level-1 clinical evidence, to surgeons and patients across the U.S.”

i-FACTOR bone graft is based on synthetic small peptide (P-15) technology developed by Cerapedics to support bone growth through cell attachment and activation. It may be used as a substitute for autologous bone in ACDF procedures.

The PMA approval is driven by data from a pivotal clinical trial comparing i-FACTOR bone graft to autograft in ACDF procedures. In the trial, i-FACTOR bone graft met all four pre-specified primary endpoints (fusion rate, NDI score, neurological outcomes, and safety success), demonstrating non-inferiority to autograft with p-values of < 0.0005 for each. In addition, a responder analysis for overall success in all four primary outcomes demonstrated 69 percent success for i-FACTOR bone graft versus 57 percent for autograft. The proportion of i-FACTOR bone graft subjects with overall success was significantly higher than that of the autograft subjects (p = 0.0382).

“We are extremely pleased and excited about the FDA’s approval of i-FACTOR bone graft for cervical spinal fusions, a large and growing market segment that, up until now, has been lacking the optimal product solution,” said Glen Kashuba, CEO of Cerapedics. “Now for the first time spine surgeons in the U.S. will have access to a biologic bone graft based on our proprietary P-15 technology platform, providing a safe and effective alternative to a patient’s own bone and other less studied products that are being marketed for cervical spine procedures. The approval will allow for the immediate U.S. commercial release of i-FACTOR bone graft and represents a significant achievement for Cerapedics.”

As a result of the FDA approval, Cerapedics has begun to engage a number of top-tier distributors, and is preparing to recruit a number of direct sales representatives, to support the U.S. commercial launch of i-FACTOR bone graft. The U.S. surgical market for biologic bone substitutes is estimated to be about $500 million.

About Cerapedics

Cerapedics is an orthobiologics company focused on developing and commercializing its proprietary synthetic small peptide (P-15) technology platform. i-FACTOR Peptide Enhanced Bone Graft is the only biologic bone graft in orthopedics that incorporates a small peptide as an attachment factor to stimulate the natural bone healing process. This novel mechanism of action is designed to support safer and more predictable bone formation compared to commercially available bone growth factors. More information can be found atwww.cerapedics.com.

(Visited 6 times, 1 visits today)

Filed Under: 2013-2019, 2015, NEWS

Primary Sidebar

PLATINUM SPONSORS

GOLD SPONSORS

MOST POPULAR POSTS

  • BROCHURES
  • (UPDATED 2025): 6 Artificial Cervical Discs You’ll…
  • What’s Happening with Globus Medical? Why Has the…
  • Just Reflective, Not Disappointed: Globus Medical’s…
  • (UPDATED 2024): +8 Lumbar Artificial Discs to Know…
  • Stryker’s Spine Business Sale: A Smart Move or a…
  • Stryker’s Spine Exit: What It Means for…
  • Why Didn’t Globus Medical’s Stock Rise After…
  • Globus Medical extends versatility of Advanced…
  • M6 Discontinued: What Are the Alternatives for a…
  • Dispute Over Spinal Implant Royalties Between…
  • Eminent Spine’s 3D Printed Titanium Pedicle Screw…
  • Orthofix Discontinues M6-C™ and M6-L™ Artificial…
  • Alphatec Today: Where It Stands and Where It’s Heading?
  • (Updated!) 15 Expandable PLIF Cages to Know…!
  • (UPDATED 2024): +108 Stand-Alone Cervical Cages to Know..!
  • What Are the Strategic Reasons Behind Globus…
  • Globus Medical Reports First Quarter 2025 Results
  • Update:Stay Tuned Next Week! Is Globus Medical the…
  • Has Globus Already Surpassed Medtronic in the Spine…
  • LAST 10 VIDEOS PUBLISHED

    1. POWEHI MEDICAL AG: TANTO® Screw
    2. Syntropiq: Taurus TLIF (Short)
    3. LEM Surgical: Dynamis Surgical Robot
    4. Aegis Spine:PathLoc-TA
    5. NGMedical: MOVE®-C Artificial Disc
    6. B.Braun Aesculap: Ennovate® Cervical MIS
    7. Spineart: PERLA® TL Deformity Solutions
    8. NGMedical: MOVE®-C
    9. Normmed Medical: ALIF Peek Cage
    10. PainTEQ: LinQ Sacroiliac

    Recent Comments

    • Sandy on Just Reflective, Not Disappointed: Globus Medical’s Bittersweet Q1 2025
    • SPINEMarketGroup on M6 Discontinued: What Are the Alternatives for a Cervical Artificial Disc?
    • Sergio López-Fombona on M6 Discontinued: What Are the Alternatives for a Cervical Artificial Disc?
    • Drew on Has Globus Already Surpassed Medtronic in the Spine Market? Can J&J Find Its Way Back to the Top?
    • Ahmed Hassan El-Naggary on Has Globus Already Surpassed Medtronic in the Spine Market? Can J&J Find Its Way Back to the Top?
    • Anonymous on Has Globus Already Surpassed Medtronic in the Spine Market? Can J&J Find Its Way Back to the Top?
    • Email
    • Twitter
    • YouTube

    Subscribe to Our Newsletter!

    Check your inbox or spam folder to confirm your subscription.

    Footer

    • Email
    • Twitter
    • YouTube

    Contact us:

    [email protected] [email protected]

    PRIVATE POLICY

    • Legal Advice
    • Embed Link
    • VIDEOS

    Copyright © 2025 · SPINEMarketGroup

    Manage Cookie Consent
    To provide the best experiences, we use technologies like cookies to store and/or access device information. Consenting to these technologies will allow us to process data such as browsing behavior or unique IDs on this site. Not consenting or withdrawing consent, may adversely affect certain features and functions.
    Functional Always active
    The technical storage or access is strictly necessary for the legitimate purpose of enabling the use of a specific service explicitly requested by the subscriber or user, or for the sole purpose of carrying out the transmission of a communication over an electronic communications network.
    Preferences
    The technical storage or access is necessary for the legitimate purpose of storing preferences that are not requested by the subscriber or user.
    Statistics
    The technical storage or access that is used exclusively for statistical purposes. The technical storage or access that is used exclusively for anonymous statistical purposes. Without a subpoena, voluntary compliance on the part of your Internet Service Provider, or additional records from a third party, information stored or retrieved for this purpose alone cannot usually be used to identify you.
    Marketing
    The technical storage or access is required to create user profiles to send advertising, or to track the user on a website or across several websites for similar marketing purposes.
    Manage options Manage services Manage {vendor_count} vendors Read more about these purposes
    View preferences
    {title} {title} {title}