• Skip to main content
  • Skip to secondary menu
  • Skip to primary sidebar
  • Skip to footer
  • MANUFACTURERS
  • HEADHUNTERS
  • PRODUCT SECTIONS
  • COMPANIES

SPINEMarketGroup

Spine Industry News

  • HOME
  • 2025
  • 2024
  • BROCHURES
  • ARTICLES
  • VIDEOS

Carmel spine surgeon wins $112M verdict in royalty battle with Medtronic

December 2, 2018 By SPINEMarketGroup

(www.ibj.com)–Dr. Rick C. Sasso, an Indiana spine surgeon and inventor, has won a sweeping, five-year legal battle against medical-device giant Medtronic, with a jury this week awarding him $112 million in damages.Sasso, 58, president of Carmel-based Indiana Spine Group, had claimed that Medtronic had violated a contract by not paying royalties he was due for spinal implants and screw-implant systems he had invented and sold to the company more than a decade ago. The systems became one of the company’s largest product lines, with annual sales of more than $200 million.

Along the way, Medtronic paid Sasso more than $20 million in royalties, but he contended the company shortchanged him, breaching its obligations and acting in bad faith.A six-person jury in Marshall County Circuit Court returned the verdict in favor of Sasso on Wednesday, wrapping up a nearly month-long trial.

Medtronic—based in suburban Minneapolis with operations in Warsaw, Indiana—had acknowledged that Sasso played a role in inventing several products. But the company argued Sasso was seeking payment “far in excess of the value of his contributions.”In a regulatory filing Thursday, the company said it has “strong arguments to appeal the verdict” and will file post-trial motions with appellate courts.

But Sasso’s attorney, Frederick Emhardt of Plews Shadley Racher & Braun, said the jury—which included two science teachers–spoke loudly with their verdict, sifting through a complicated set of facts and circumstances.

“After a month of evidence, they learned much about spine surgery and the business of medical device sales and the need to honor contractual commitments, even if they were made by persons no longer with a company,” he said in an email. “In a period of six hours, they unanimously rendered a verdict awarding to a dollar what Dr. Sasso requested—$112,452,269. The jury system is a bedrock of our way of life. It worked exactly the way intended by our founders.”

READ complete Article:https://www.ibj.com

(Visited 59 times, 14 visits today)

Filed Under: Legal, NEWS Tagged With: 2018, NEWS

Reader Interactions

Comments

  1. Patrick Pilcher says

    December 6, 2018 at 8:22 pm

    Couldn’t have happened to a nicer guy (Sasso) and sends a clear message to companies like Medtronic who have played this game on a regular basis. Several surgeons I know have been in this exact scenario–royalty agreements–above and beyond simple scope of work consultant contracts–and the companies find ways to diminish or de-emphasize what they are legally bound to compensate. Many times, these legal decisions are not made public, so kudos to Dr. Sasso and his legal team for showing the dark underbelly of how some of the legacy (not all) companies operate…

Primary Sidebar

PLATINUM SPONSORS

GOLD SPONSORS

MOST POPULAR POSTS

  • BROCHURES
  • Just Reflective, Not Disappointed: Globus Medical’s…
  • Thinking About a Spine Robot? Your 2025 Guide to the…
  • The Crown Is Still Medtronic’s… For Now!
  • What’s Happening with Globus Medical? Why Has the…
  • After Diabetes, Could Medtronic’s Spine…
  • Top Expandable Cages of 2025: Which Lumbar Implants…
  • (UPDATED 2024): +8 Lumbar Artificial Discs to Know…
  • Globus Medical to Execute $500 Million Share Buyback…
  • Eminent Spine’s 3D Printed Titanium Pedicle Screw…
  • Globus Medical extends versatility of Advanced…
  • Dispute Over Spinal Implant Royalties Between…
  • M6 Discontinued: What Are the Alternatives for a…
  • (UPDATED 2025): 6 Artificial Cervical Discs You’ll…
  • Stryker’s Spine Business Sale: A Smart Move or a…
  • (UPDATED 2024): +108 Stand-Alone Cervical Cages to Know..!
  • (Updated!) 15 Expandable PLIF Cages to Know…!
  • Globus Medical Reports First Quarter 2025 Results
  • Orthofix Discontinues M6-C™ and M6-L™ Artificial…
  • Viscogliosi Brothers Completes Acquisition of U.S.…
  • LAST 10 VIDEOS PUBLISHED

    1. Alphatec Spine: ATEC PTP™ Corpectomy
    2. XACT ACE® Robotic System
    3. Perlove Medical: Spine Surgery Robot
    4. FUTURTEC: ORTHBOT Spinal ROBOT
    5. Biedermann Motech: MOSS 100 (Short)
    6. POWEHI MEDICAL AG: KUDOS™ Modular
    7. POWEHI MEDICAL AG: TANTO® Screw
    8. Syntropiq: Taurus TLIF (Short)
    9. LEM Surgical: Dynamis Surgical Robot
    10. Aegis Spine:PathLoc-TA

    Recent Comments

    • Peter on Thinking About a Spine Robot? Your 2025 Guide to the Best Models, What’s Coming, Why You Need One, and Which Is Truly the Best?
    • Daniel on Thinking About a Spine Robot? Your 2025 Guide to the Best Models, What’s Coming, Why You Need One, and Which Is Truly the Best?
    • Peter on A New Player in Spinal Care, POWEHI Medical!
    • Sandy on Just Reflective, Not Disappointed: Globus Medical’s Bittersweet Q1 2025
    • SPINEMarketGroup on M6 Discontinued: What Are the Alternatives for a Cervical Artificial Disc?
    • Sergio López-Fombona on M6 Discontinued: What Are the Alternatives for a Cervical Artificial Disc?
    • Email
    • Twitter
    • YouTube

    Subscribe to Our Newsletter!

    Check your inbox or spam folder to confirm your subscription.

    Footer

    • Email
    • Twitter
    • YouTube

    Contact us:

    [email protected] [email protected]

    PRIVATE POLICY

    • Legal Advice
    • Embed Link
    • VIDEOS

    Copyright © 2025 · SPINEMarketGroup

    Manage Cookie Consent
    To provide the best experiences, we use technologies like cookies to store and/or access device information. Consenting to these technologies will allow us to process data such as browsing behavior or unique IDs on this site. Not consenting or withdrawing consent, may adversely affect certain features and functions.
    Functional Always active
    The technical storage or access is strictly necessary for the legitimate purpose of enabling the use of a specific service explicitly requested by the subscriber or user, or for the sole purpose of carrying out the transmission of a communication over an electronic communications network.
    Preferences
    The technical storage or access is necessary for the legitimate purpose of storing preferences that are not requested by the subscriber or user.
    Statistics
    The technical storage or access that is used exclusively for statistical purposes. The technical storage or access that is used exclusively for anonymous statistical purposes. Without a subpoena, voluntary compliance on the part of your Internet Service Provider, or additional records from a third party, information stored or retrieved for this purpose alone cannot usually be used to identify you.
    Marketing
    The technical storage or access is required to create user profiles to send advertising, or to track the user on a website or across several websites for similar marketing purposes.
    Manage options Manage services Manage {vendor_count} vendors Read more about these purposes
    View preferences
    {title} {title} {title}