Today,I came across a LinkedIn post about a spine-focused meeting organized by a Spanish company, where the central topic of discussion was whether “trends” or “fashions” exist in spine surgery. This sparked my interest because it’s a highly relevant question in today’s rapidly evolving medical landscape, with new technologies like robotics gaining attention alongside older approaches such as endoscopic spine surgery. The debate highlighted the importance of distinguishing between genuine innovation and fleeting trends, making it a timely and valuable reflection for anyone involved in spine care.
What Do We Mean by “Trend”?
In medicine, a trend isn’t just something that comes and goes. It can be a new technique or technology adopted rapidly—driven by the promise of innovation, by industry momentum, or by the fear of being left behind. Sometimes these innovations mark genuine progress. Other times, they generate enthusiasm without delivering lasting results.
MIS and the “Halo Effect” of Innovation
A clear example was the rise of minimally invasive surgery (MIS) in the early 2000s. It promised faster recovery, reduced postoperative pain, and smaller incisions. Medtronic’s Sextant system, designed for percutaneous pedicle screw placement, quickly became a symbol of this movement.But limitations soon became apparent: steep learning curves, high radiation exposure from fluoroscopy, and clinical outcomes that weren’t always better than traditional approaches. Today, MIS still plays a critical role—but mainly in well-selected cases, performed by well-trained teams. The lesson? Not every innovation is universally applicable.
Robotics and Surgical Navigation: Hype vs. Value
More recently, robotic assistance and intraoperative navigation have become the new frontier. These technologies do offer improvements in surgical accuracy and implant placement. But they also come with major challenges: high costs, increased operative time, steep learning curves, and the need for substantial infrastructure.The risk, as with past trends, is acquiring technology for its novelty or prestige—without a clear plan or adequate preparation. When this happens, innovation can become an expensive distraction.
Who Drives These Trends?
The industry certainly plays a central role, as innovation is necessary for growth and competition. But surgeons themselves, scientific societies, medical congresses—and even patients—also contribute. Surgeons seek academic prestige, patients demand cutting-edge treatments, and scientific forums often reward novelty over long-term value.When all these forces align, a trend can quickly become standard practice—even if the supporting evidence is still thin.
How Can We Tell the Difference Between Innovation and Trend?
It helps to ask a few critical questions:
- Does this address a real and frequent clinical problem?
- Is there solid, long-term evidence supporting it?
- Does it truly improve patient outcomes—not just technical metrics?
- Is our team adequately trained to use it?
- If we could go back, would we choose this approach again?
So, Are There Trends in Spine Surgery?
Yes, there are trends in spine surgery—just as in any rapidly evolving medical field. Some trends represent genuine progress that improves patient care and advances surgical practice. Others, however, can be detours fueled by hype, commercial interests, or the desire to appear cutting-edge without sufficient evidence to support widespread adoption.
The crucial challenge for spine surgeons and healthcare providers is to maintain rigorous clinical judgment and critical thinking. It means resisting the temptation to jump on every new technology or technique simply because it is novel or heavily marketed. Instead, it requires carefully weighing the benefits against the risks, costs, and real impact on patient outcomes.Innovation should always be grounded in solid, reproducible evidence and integrated thoughtfully into clinical practice with proper training and infrastructure. Shortcuts or uncritical enthusiasm can lead to wasted resources, patient disappointment, and potentially worse outcomes.
Ultimately, the goal is to provide the best possible care—combining experience, prudence, and openness to true advances. Being at the forefront of technology does not guarantee better results; sometimes, it’s about choosing the right approach for each patient, even if it is the tried-and-true method.
Because at the end of the day, good surgery isn’t about doing what’s newest or flashiest—it’s about doing what’s right.
###
Cover Image: https://www.freepik.com