• Skip to main content
  • Skip to secondary menu
  • Skip to primary sidebar
  • Skip to footer
  • MANUFACTURERS
  • HEADHUNTERS
  • PRODUCT SECTIONS
  • COMPANIES

SPINEMarketGroup

Spine Industry News

  • HOME
  • 2025
  • 2024
  • BROCHURES
  • ARTICLES
  • VIDEOS

5 reasons why taking device sales reps out of the OR is a big mistake

October 22, 2015 By SPINEMarketGroup

Healthcare costs are spiraling out of control, and hospitals and health systems are attempting to reign in spending. Organizations are scaling back and cutting corners throughout the many stages of care. In an attempt to save money, some hospitals are experimenting with a rep-less medical device sales model.

In the traditional model, a medical device sales rep from the implant manufacturer is present during procedures to guide and consult the surgeon. In the rep-less model, surgeons don’t receive support from the manufacturer.

Several medical device manufacturers and health systems including the Loma Linda University Medical Center, Royal Oak Medical Devices, and Wright Medical are piloting rep-less programs. Hospitals can purchase implants at about half the cost when they forgo the help from a medical device sales rep.

Although some believe these programs will slowly replace device sales reps over the next few years, reps are still very much needed in health systems to deliver quality care.

Here are a few reasons why the rep-less sales model won’t work in today’s health care system:

Knowledge and experience

Medical device sales reps play a critical role in the OR. Their extensive knowledge of the devices they sell allows them to consult with surgeons and provide clinical benefit. A medical sales device rep also sets up product trays with hundreds of instruments to deliver to the OR before the procedure.

While physician specialists are the experts in their medical field, the medical device sales rep is the expert on their products. Their attention to detail and specialized experience makes procedures safer and more efficient for patients. The rep acts as an extra safety net in the OR in case there is a complication or problem with the device or implant.

Unrealistic cost reductions

In order for the process to work without a medical device sales rep, hospital staff need to be trained to assist the surgeon with the devices in the OR. But training is expensive, especially considering the time to train — time staff could be spending completing their regular responsibilities.

In addition, procedures without a rep will likely take more time in the OR. The newly trained hospital staff member won’t have the same amount of experience and familiarity with devices and will likely take more time to do the same job. Using less experienced staff may also lead to poor outcomes, readmissions, and secondary procedures. Considering these factors, any potential cost-savings from a repless model won’t add up to much.

Training headaches

In a university or teaching hospital setting, training staff members on devices gets complicated. Professionals and students with different levels of experience are coming in and out of the health system, and making sure everyone is on the same page is a challenge.

In addition, the turnover rate for hospital staff will make keeping up with training difficult. Training for devices will become a continuous effort that isn’t feasible for busy hospitals in an overburdened healthcare system.

Staff shortage

In the wake of the Affordable Care Act, more patients are seeking care, but there aren’t enough physicians to provide that care. In a report published in November 2013, the Health Resources and Services Administration predicted a shortage of 20,400 primary care providers if the delivery system for primary care remains the same.

With the shortage of providers, additional responsibilities are falling on the shoulders of nurse practitioners, nurses, and other hospital staff. Without the medical device sales rep, overworked hospital staff have one more thing they need to worry about. Frustrated staff may walk out the door for opportunities with organizations that still use medical device sales reps.

Patient choice

The new healthcare model empowers patients to take a greater role in their own care. Patients who are more involved in their health want choices to personalize their treatment. But the rep-less model requires hospitals to cut the choices they can offer patients.

Health systems testing the model contract with a single company to buy implants. Patients and doctors no longer have a choice and automatically receive the implant the contracted manufacturer offers. In this model, care becomes more standardized, moving away from the new healthcare model focused on individualized care.

What do you think? Will the medical device sales rep disappear?

SOURCE:https://medcitynews.com/2015/06/5-reasons-taking-device-sales-reps-out-of-the-or-is-a-big-mistake/

(Visited 103 times, 37 visits today)

Filed Under: 2013-2019, 2015, ARTICLES, NEWS Tagged With: 2015, NEWS

Primary Sidebar

PLATINUM SPONSORS

GOLD SPONSORS

MOST POPULAR POSTS

  • BROCHURES
  • Just Reflective, Not Disappointed: Globus Medical’s…
  • Thinking About a Spine Robot? Your 2025 Guide to the…
  • The Crown Is Still Medtronic’s… For Now!
  • What’s Happening with Globus Medical? Why Has the…
  • After Diabetes, Could Medtronic’s Spine…
  • Top Expandable Cages of 2025: Which Lumbar Implants…
  • (UPDATED 2024): +8 Lumbar Artificial Discs to Know…
  • Globus Medical to Execute $500 Million Share Buyback…
  • Eminent Spine’s 3D Printed Titanium Pedicle Screw…
  • Globus Medical extends versatility of Advanced…
  • Dispute Over Spinal Implant Royalties Between…
  • M6 Discontinued: What Are the Alternatives for a…
  • (UPDATED 2025): 6 Artificial Cervical Discs You’ll…
  • Stryker’s Spine Business Sale: A Smart Move or a…
  • (UPDATED 2024): +108 Stand-Alone Cervical Cages to Know..!
  • (Updated!) 15 Expandable PLIF Cages to Know…!
  • Globus Medical Reports First Quarter 2025 Results
  • Orthofix Discontinues M6-C™ and M6-L™ Artificial…
  • Viscogliosi Brothers Completes Acquisition of U.S.…
  • LAST 10 VIDEOS PUBLISHED

    1. Alphatec Spine: ATEC PTP™ Corpectomy
    2. XACT ACE® Robotic System
    3. Perlove Medical: Spine Surgery Robot
    4. FUTURTEC: ORTHBOT Spinal ROBOT
    5. Biedermann Motech: MOSS 100 (Short)
    6. POWEHI MEDICAL AG: KUDOS™ Modular
    7. POWEHI MEDICAL AG: TANTO® Screw
    8. Syntropiq: Taurus TLIF (Short)
    9. LEM Surgical: Dynamis Surgical Robot
    10. Aegis Spine:PathLoc-TA

    Recent Comments

    • Peter on Thinking About a Spine Robot? Your 2025 Guide to the Best Models, What’s Coming, Why You Need One, and Which Is Truly the Best?
    • Daniel on Thinking About a Spine Robot? Your 2025 Guide to the Best Models, What’s Coming, Why You Need One, and Which Is Truly the Best?
    • Peter on A New Player in Spinal Care, POWEHI Medical!
    • Sandy on Just Reflective, Not Disappointed: Globus Medical’s Bittersweet Q1 2025
    • SPINEMarketGroup on M6 Discontinued: What Are the Alternatives for a Cervical Artificial Disc?
    • Sergio López-Fombona on M6 Discontinued: What Are the Alternatives for a Cervical Artificial Disc?
    • Email
    • Twitter
    • YouTube

    Subscribe to Our Newsletter!

    Check your inbox or spam folder to confirm your subscription.

    Footer

    • Email
    • Twitter
    • YouTube

    Contact us:

    [email protected] [email protected]

    PRIVATE POLICY

    • Legal Advice
    • Embed Link
    • VIDEOS

    Copyright © 2025 · SPINEMarketGroup

    Manage Cookie Consent
    To provide the best experiences, we use technologies like cookies to store and/or access device information. Consenting to these technologies will allow us to process data such as browsing behavior or unique IDs on this site. Not consenting or withdrawing consent, may adversely affect certain features and functions.
    Functional Always active
    The technical storage or access is strictly necessary for the legitimate purpose of enabling the use of a specific service explicitly requested by the subscriber or user, or for the sole purpose of carrying out the transmission of a communication over an electronic communications network.
    Preferences
    The technical storage or access is necessary for the legitimate purpose of storing preferences that are not requested by the subscriber or user.
    Statistics
    The technical storage or access that is used exclusively for statistical purposes. The technical storage or access that is used exclusively for anonymous statistical purposes. Without a subpoena, voluntary compliance on the part of your Internet Service Provider, or additional records from a third party, information stored or retrieved for this purpose alone cannot usually be used to identify you.
    Marketing
    The technical storage or access is required to create user profiles to send advertising, or to track the user on a website or across several websites for similar marketing purposes.
    Manage options Manage services Manage {vendor_count} vendors Read more about these purposes
    View preferences
    {title} {title} {title}